Neurodidactic Teaching and Learning Strategies for Legal Research DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v11i1.142

Main Article Content

Salamanca-Kacic, A.
BO
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4846-7043

Abstract

The fact that each brain is unique and points to the need to consider the diversity of students and the fact that teachers are flexible in training and evaluation processes. If all students can improve, teachers' expectations towards them must always be positive, applying strategies that develop the emotional-affective, combining with the rational, where they do not have to condition negative attitudes or past behaviors. Emotions are unconscious reactions that nature has devised to ensure survival that, for our benefit, we must learn to manage, not eradicate. Neuroscience has shown that emotions maintain curiosity; they serve both to establish communication, being essential in reasoning processes, as, in decision-making, emotional and cognitive processes are inseparable. The objective of the research was to identify neurodidactic strategies for the teaching-learning process of Legal Research in the last semesters of the Law Degree; Through Participatory Action Research applying the participant-observation method with a first strategic academic tool of diagnostic evaluation commanded by the neurodidactic way using the descriptive, developing criteria for consideration in this article that result in the following results: Student-centered methodologies, meaningful learning, linking theory with practice, and recognition of the emotional are some of the neurodidactic strategies identified.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Salamanca-Kacic, A. (2021). Neurodidactic Teaching and Learning Strategies for Legal Research . Docentes 2.0 Journal, 11(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v11i1.142
Section
Articles

Citaciones del Artículo



References

Carpena C., A. (2001). Educación Socioemocionala Primaria: Materiales Prácticos de Reflexión. España: EUMO.

Díaz, P. (2018). Neuroeducación. Madrid: Telefonica.

Díaz-Barriga, F. (2010). Estrategia Docentes para un Aprendizaje Significativo. McGraw Hill.

Gardner, H. (2010). La Inteligencia Reformulada: Las inteligencias Múltiples en el siglo XXI. Paidos.

Gargallo, B., Garfella, P., Perez, C. & Fernandez, A. (2010). Modelos de enseñanza aprendizaje. Madrid: Universidad Complutense.

Guasch, O. (2002). Observación Participante. Cuadernos Metodológicos(20), 105.

Jensen, E. (2004). Cerebro y aprendizaje: Competencias e Implicaciones Educativas. http://www.ericjensen.com/

Kingsbury, L. & Hong, W. (2020). Revisión de funciones Un marco de múltiples cerebros para la interacción social. Trends in Neurosciences, 43(9), 651-666. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.06.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.06.008

Landaeta-Mendoza, C. (2020). Gestión del Conocimiento desde una Mirada Compleja y Transdisciplinar en la Universidad Privada San Francisco de Asís –El Alto. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 9(2), 79-87. doi:https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.148

Mujica-Sequera, R. M. (2020). La Enseñanza Tecnoemocional en la Educación del Siglo XXI. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 9(2), 71.78. doi:https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.147

Robayo-Valle, A. (2017). La importancia del asombro en la educación para lograr aprendizajes significativos. Universidad de los Hemisferios. http://dspace.uhemisferios.edu.ec:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/692

Salamanca, H. (2006). Introducción a la Investigación Social y Monográfica (5ta. ed.). Causa.

Soto R., M. (2016). Un Mundo Educado. http://unmundoeducado.blogspot.com/

Únete a nuestro canal de Telegram para recibir notificaciones de nuestras publicaciones