Influence of the Interactive Model of Keith E. Stanovich on the Understanding of the Short Texts in English of the 9th Grade Students of the I. E. Escuela Normal Superior San Mateo, Boyacá
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.169
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This action research was conducted with the aim of analyzing the influence of the Interactive Model of Keith E. Stanovich in the students’ reading comprehension of short texts in English. The previously mentioned reading model takes into account the continuous interaction between the bottom-up model in which the reader decodes a text starting from the smallest units (letters to words, phrases to sentences, etc.) and top-down model in which the reader contributes a great deal of knowledge, expectations, assumptions and questions to the text and, giving a basic understanding of the vocabulary, continues reading while the text confirms his expectations. Thus, text comprehension can be understood as an interactive process between the reader's prior knowledge of content and structure, and the text itself. This study was developed under a mixed approach and the instruments employed to gather the data were two diagnostic tests, four workshops, and two final tests applied to ten ninth-grade students from the Normal School in San Mateo (Boyacá). The data were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively, using the proposed research instruments by Vanegas (2020). Regarding the findings, it was concluded that the use of the interactive reading approach was effective in improving students’ reading comprehension ability both literally and inferentially.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Adams, M., y Collins, A. (1979). A schema-theoretic view of reading. USA: Pub. Corporation.
Aguirre (2015) Eficacia del método pedagógico “Material para la mejora de la Comprensión Lectora a partir de la Formación de Inferencias” aplicado a niños de 8 años que padecen la enfermedad de cáncer y presentan dificultades en comprensión lectora. Perú, Universidad de los Hermisferios. Recuperado de: file:///C:/Users/I.E.%20NORMAL%20SUPERIOR/Downloads/Tesis%20Final%20M arco.pdf
Anderson, N. J. (1999): Exploring second language reading: Issues and Strategies. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Badel, J. (2020). La novela gráfica como herramienta didáctica para lectura de textos literarios desde la perspectiva culturalista. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 9(1), 142-145. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i1.115
Carrell, P. (1998). Interactive text processing: implications for esl/second language reading classrooms. In P. Carrell, J. Devine & D. Eskey, (eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (p. 73-92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, A. D (1990): Language Learning: Insight for learners, teachers, and researchers. New York: New bury House Publisher.
Dechant, E. (1991). Understanding and teaching reading: An interactive model. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gamboa, A, (2017). Reading Comprehension in an English as a Foreign Language Setting: Teaching Strategies for Sixth Graders Based on the Interactive Model of Reading. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Uniminuto. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/folios/n45/n45a12.pdf
Hernández-Sampieri, R. & Mendoza, C (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. Mc Graw Hill Education,
Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2004). Educational research. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage.
Nur, D., Ahmad, A, (2017). Improving students’ reading skill through interactive approach at the first grade of SMAN 1 Mare, Bone. Maré, Nueva Caledonia: Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar. Recuperado de: http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/Eternal/article/view/3951/3602
Redondo R., J. (1997). La dinámica escolar: de la diferencia a la desigualdad. Revista de Psicología. Facultad de Ciencias. Chile. Universidad de Chile. Volumen VI, Edición Electrónica. pp. 54.
Rumelhart, D.E. (1980) Schemata: the building blocks of cognition. In: R.J. Spiro etal. (eds) Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Samuels, J. & Kamil, A. (1988). Models of the reading process. En: P.D. Pearson, P. Mosenthal, M. Kamil & R. Barr (Eds.). Handbook of Reading Research. New York: Longman, Inc.
Shawn, D, (2012). Utilizing the Interactive Reading Model in a Continuing Education Cours. Brattleboro, Vermont, SIT Graduate Institute. Recuperado de: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1541&context=ipp_collection
Stanovich, K. (1980). Toward and interactive-compensatory model of difference in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quartely, 16, 32-71.
Vanegas, D. (2020). Procedimiento e Instrumentos de Investigación. Universidad de Pamplona.
Zúñiga, G. (2001). Constructing literacy from reading in first and second language. Neiva, Universidad Surcolombiana: Oti Impresos.
Únete a nuestro canal de Telegram para recibir notificaciones de nuestras publicaciones
