Differentiated Education through Hybrid Learning Environments in Teaching and Learning of Mathematics DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v17i1.455
Main Article Content
Abstract
Students are immersed in a digital age, so much of their time is spent using electronic devices, playing games, messaging, and social networks. This essay was framed under the inductive method in the humanistic paradigm, with a qualitative, interpretive approach and topical narrative design to reflect on the importance of implementing differentiated education in teaching. They are learning mathematics through hybrid learning environments, aiming to improve the quality of mathematics education, adapting it to students' individual needs, and taking advantage of the advantages of technology. In this sense, the historical and research background and conceptual bases of applying a differentiated education approach in mathematics through hybrid environments are presented. This combination offers a promising approach to addressing the changing needs of students through flexible spaces in an increasingly digital and diverse world.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Group.
Bates, A. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age (Segunda ed.). Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 95-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. En C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham. Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. CA: Pfeiffe.
Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003
Gregory, G. H., & Chapman, C. (2007). Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn't fit al. Corwin Press.
Hattie, J. A. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522
Joseph, S., Thomas, M., Simonette, G., & Ramsook, L. (2013). The impact of differentiated instruction in a teacher education setting: Successes and challenges. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(3), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n3p28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n3p28
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Karla, J. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. U.S. Department of Education.
Mera, C. (2012). Concepto, aplicación y modelo de prospectiva estratégica en la administración de las organizaciones. Revista Estrategia Organizacional: UNAD, 1(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.22490/25392786.1208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/25392786.1208
Pernías, P. A. (2017). Nuevos empleos, nuevas habilidades: ¿estamos preparando el talento para la Cuarta Revolución Industrial? ICE (898). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32796/ice.2017.898.1961
Picciano, A. G. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 7-18. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ837540.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i1.1673
Rama, C. (2021). La nueva educación híbrida. D.R. Unión de Universidades de América Latina y el Caribe, A.C.
Sing, H., & Thurman, A. (2014). The empirical effects of blended learning on student outcomes in post-secondary education. The Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 7(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated instruction: A research basis. International Education Journal, 7(7), 935-947. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ854351.pdf
Tomlinson, C. A. (2005). Grading and Differentiation: Paradox or Good Practice? Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 262-269. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4403_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4403_11
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms. ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Allan, S. D. (2000). Leadership for Differentiating Schools & Classrooms. ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and Student Success in a Differentiated Classroom. ASCD. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483365633.n1
Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating Instruction in Response to Student Readiness, Interest, and Learning Profile in Academically Diverse Classrooms: A Review of Literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2-3), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203
Unesco. (2014). Enfoques estratégicos sobre las TIC en educación en América Latina y el Caribe. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000223251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/anales.v45i3-4.6061
Unesco. (2017). Guía para asegurar la inclusión y la equidad en la educación. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000259592
Vaughan, N. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2018). Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. Athabasca University Prees.