The Contribution of Inferential Reading Strategies to Improve the Reading Comprehension Skill in an Online Private Lesson Context
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In response to the increasing importance of effective online learning strategies, the following study explored the contribution of inferential reading strategies to improving reading comprehension skills within an online learning framework. The research was based on the action research model, using a mixed approach that collects quantitative and qualitative data from four students between 16 and 18 years old who received strategic reading instruction during four sessions. By employing pre- and post-tests along with semi-structured interviews, the study assessed both quantitative and qualitative aspects of participants' understanding and perceptions. The results indicated a notable improvement in inferential reading comprehension at both the group and individual levels, although with some inconsistencies in performance on specific items. Participants understood learning strategies, inference, and their application in comprehension tasks. Furthermore, the participants' positive attitudes towards strategy instruction were evident, with many expressing comfort, engagement, and motivation. They particularly emphasized the role of lesson organization, reflection, and feedback in enhancing their comprehension skills. This research underscores the effectiveness of integrating inferential reading strategies in online learning environments, providing valuable insights into student perceptions and the impact of strategy instruction on reading comprehension.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
Citaciones del Artículo
How to Cite
References
comprehension. E?itim ve bilim. https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2020.8782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8782
Burns, A. (2009). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A guide for Practitioners. https://n9.cl/ou9m1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863466
Chamot, A., & Robbins, J. (2005). The CALLA model: Strategies for ELL student success. Second Language Learning Consultants. https://n9.cl/jjl8x
Cheng, L., Wu, Y., & Liu, X. (2015). Chinese university students’ perceptions of assessment tasks and classroom assessment environment. Language Testing in Asia, 5(13). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-015-0020-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-015-0020-6
Dorman, J. P., & Knightley, W. M. (2006). Development and validation of an instrument to assess secondary school students’ perceptions of assessment tasks. Educational studies, 32(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690500415951 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690500415951
Elleman, A. M. (2017). Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers: A Metaanalytic Review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 761-781. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000180
Fälth, L., & Nord, A. (2018). Reading strategies in high school: High school students’ experiences of an inclusive education approach. International Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 29-37. https://n9.cl/hyoit
Fu, Y. (2012). A study on Strategies-Based reading instruction at College level. Studies in Literature and Language, 4(3), 50-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2–3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gómez, Á., Devís, A., & López, V. S. (2013). Corrección de errores en comprensión lectora en inglés: una instrucción teóricamente fundamentada basada en estrategias macroestructurales. Tejuelo, 16(16), 88-107. https://n9.cl/35qmq
Hara, A. & Tappe, H. (2016). Inference generation and text comprehension in bilingual children: A case study’, Literator, 37(2), a1287. https://n9.cl/9kwigh DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/lit.v37i2.1287
Lee, H. C. (2013). Thinking Matters: Inferencing in ESL reading lessons. TESOL Journal, 4(4), 717-742. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.75 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.75
Lopera, S. (2012). Effects of strategy instruction in an EFL reading comprehension course: A case study. Profile Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 14(1), 79-89. https://n9.cl/2gl2g
Mwita, M.K. (2022). Factors to consider when using qualitative interviews in data collection. Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Journal (SHE Journal), 3(3), 313 – 323. https://n9.cl/ocsp1s
Nuttall, C. (2005). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Oxford. Macmillan Education.
Pacheco, N. (2019). How Effective is the Metacognitive Strategy of Thinking Aloud in Enhancing Reading Comprehension for Students with Special Learning Needs Working in a 10th Grade English Language Class. https://n9.cl/meu0t3
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2013). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. https://n9.cl/nghte DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Pan, S., & Sana, F. (2021). Pretesting versus posttesting: Comparing the pedagogical benefits of errorful generation and retrieval practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(2), 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000345
Taft, S., Kesten, K., & El-Banna, M. (2019). One size does not fit all: Toward an evidence-based framework for determining online course enrollment sizes in higher education. Online Learning, 23(3), 188-233. DOI:10.24059/olj.v23i3.1534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i3.1534
William and Mary School of Education. (2002). Inferential Reading Comprehension Packet. https://n9.cl/qsh2nc
Younus, M., & Khan, I. (2017). The effects of strategy-based reading instruction on reading comprehension and reading strategy use. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 5(2), 106-120. DOI:10.20547/jess0521705202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20547/jess0521705202
Join our community
Receive notifications about new calls for papers, publications and academic events.