Analysis of Precautionary Measures Against Constitutional Jurisdiction in Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.139
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
At the beginning of humanity, human beings have suffered a series of abuses, this is because they are caused by some type of violation of their rights, be it by private persons or public or private entities. In the Ecuadorian legal system, the methods of action and regulation of protection, as well as the precautionary measures have differences, in this way the procedure of how they are regulated in the constitution, looks a bit incoherent and the order of execution of precautionary measures are of constitutional jurisdiction. The purpose of this investigation was to know the specific processes and parameters for the processes of precautionary measures of constitutional jurisdiction, to protect the rights of the person without appealing a violation of this. For this research, an analytical, synthetic, deductive, and inductive method was performed with a mixed approach (quantitative and quality); An analysis of 5 cases taken from different processes in a certain time was carried out. The results obtained support that precautionary measures by nature constitute an important instrument and will allow the protection of the rights that are recognized in the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador (2008) for this reason, precautionary measures play a double role, for a On the other hand, it is responsible for protecting the rights of people, on the other hand, the necessary ignorance in constitutional matters, the section of the legal system can cause severe damage to third parties.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Asamblea Nacional Del Ecuador. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Recuperado de: www.oas.org: https://www.oas.org/juridico/mla/sp/ecu/sp_ecu-int-text-const.pdf
Ávila, R. (2011). Del amparo a la acción de protección jurisdiccional. Revista IUS, 5(27). Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-21472011000100006
Bedón, R. (2017). Aplicación de los derechos de la naturaleza en Ecuador. Revista Veredas do Direto, BeIu Hoirite, 14(28), 13 -32. Recuperado de: http://dspace.uhemisferios.edu.ec:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/984/PUB%20ARTICULOS%20APLICACI%c3%93N%20DE%20LOS%20DERECHOS%20DE%20LA%20NATURALEZA%20EN%20ECUADOR%20-%20copia.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Bernal, P. (2016). Metodología de la investigación (cuarta ed.). México: mg. Recuperado de: www.googlenbbbkbcknbjbxcxnbk
Cortez, G. (2017). Contribución al estudio de las medidas cautelares previas a la demanda en el proceso civil chileno. Revista de Derecho (Valdivia), 30(1), 235 - 261. Recuperado de: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1737/173752279010.pdf
Crespo, L. (2020). La Acción Nuclear del Delito Informático en la Novísima Reforma Parcial del Código Orgánico Integral Penal. Revista Docente 2.0, 8(1), 1-11. Recuperado de: https://ojs.docentes20.com/index.php/revista-docentes20/article/view/89/254
Falquez, J. (2016). Problemas jurídicos ambientales que se presentan en el centro de la ciudad de Guayaquil y su incidencia en el medio. Revista Jurídica, 1(1). Recuperado de: https://www.revistajuridicaonline.com/2008/03/problemas-jurdicos-ambientales-que-se-presentan-en-el-centro-de-la-ciudad-de-guayaquil/+&cd=1&hl=es-419&ct=clnk&gl=ec
Guerrero, E. (2015). Transformaciones judiciales en el Ecuador: el equilibrio de poderes visto a través del análisis de redes sociales. Revista Ius Humani, 4(1), 263 - 297. Recuperado de: https://Dialnet-TransformacionesJudicialesEnElEcuador-5278448.pdf
Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional (LEXIS) (2009). Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales Y Control Constitucional. Recuperado de: https://www.oas.org/juridico/PDFs/mesicic4_ecu_org2.pdf
López, A. (2018). La acción de protección su eficacia y aplicación en el Ecuador. Revista Dom. Cien., 4(1), 155 - 177. Recuperado de: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/6255077.pdf
Paredes, C. (2016). “La Garantía Jurisdiccional de Medidas Cautelares y la Protección de los Derechos consagrados en la Constitución”. Tesis de pregrado de Universidad Central del Ecuador, 1- 122. Recuperado de: http://www.dspace.uce.edu.ec/bitstream/25000/7379/1/T-UCE-0013-Ab-344.pdf
Proaño, J. (2013). Las medidas cautelares constitucionales autónomas en el Ecuador. Tesis de pregrado de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. Recuperado de: http://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/bitstream/handle/22000/7002/13.J01.001694.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
Thury, V. (2016). Medidas cautelares y nuevas funciones del juez en la formulación de políticas públicas. Revista Boletín mexicano de derecho comparado, 49(147), 1- 18. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-86332016000300245
Vaca, R. (2017). Medidas Cautelares Constitucionales. Recuperado de: https://www.derechoecuador.com/medidas-cautelares-constitucionales
Vernaza, G., Cevallos, G., & Rey, C. (2016). Desarrollo sostenible: perspectiva jurídica - ambiental del buen vivir (convivir el humano y la naturaleza). Revista: DELOS Desarrollo Local Sostenible, 9(26), 1- 8. Recuperado de: https://www.eumed.net/rev/delos/26/naturaleza.html
Verraza, G. (2013). Hacia una cultura jurídica ambiental en Ecuador. Revista Administración y desarrollo, 42(58), 1- 12. Recuperado de: https://Dialnet-HaciaUnaCulturaJuridicaAmbientalEnEcuador-6403480.pdf
Únete a nuestro canal de Telegram para recibir notificaciones de nuestras publicaciones
