Use of Technology as a Preponderant Resource in Distance Learning in Times of Social Lock-Down DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v11i1.197
Main Article Content
Abstract
Today, a systemic-holistic educational model is continuously being worked on, which is constantly evolving. In this way, the present study had to understand how Learning and Knowledge Technologies (LKT) contributed to the preparation of high school students in the context of distance education throughout confinement for COVID-19. Used a qualitative approach was following the Constructivist Grounded Theory design. The results highlighted that the TAC favored the students experience in different ways; firstly, because the pedagogical strategies had a more significant impact on the teaching process since various situations were promoted, directing high schoolers to play an active role; second, technological resources allowed easy management of learning through different electronic-digital devices; finally, the use of technologies promoted the development of digital skills through constant interaction with applications, as well as with platforms used for formation purposes. Similarly, some research investigations related to the use of technology for educational environments entered the discussion. Among the main conclusions, the importance of maintaining sensitivity towards adolescents in their performance and acquisition of technological skills is underlined, especially when they are not familiar with knowledge management through these means. However, they were born in a digital or artificial intelligence era, the skills possessed by many of them have not reached an academic level.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Aguilar, N. L. & Manzano, N. (2018). La mentoría en el nivel universitario: Etapas para su implementación. Universidad y Sociedad, 10(1), 255-262. http://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus
Alvarez, A. V., Ventura, D. R. M., & Opiniano, J. O. Going the distance: perceptions of teachers in open and distance continuing professional development. Globus Journal of Progressive Education, 10(20), 60-66. https://www.globusedujournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GE-JD207-Abel-V.-Alvarez.pdf
Amar, V. M. (2017). La importancia de la TAC en la educación y cambios sociales. Revista De Estudios Socioeducativos. ReSed, (5), 16-28. https://revistas.uca.es/index.php/ReSed/article/view/S.1.1N5
Arias, F. G. (2012). El Proyecto de Investigación: Introducción a la metodología científica (sexta edición). Editorial Episteme, C.A.
Brayant, A. (2017). Grounded theory and grounded theorizing: Pragmatism in research process. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199922604.001.0001
Caló, G. (1956). Maria Montessori. En Château, J. (dir), Moreau, J., García, V., Mesnard, P., Piobetta., Mallinson, V., J. B., Meylan, L., Flitner, W., Savioz, R., Plancke, R., Dottrens, R., & Brubacher, J. S. Los grandes pedagogos. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Casablancas, S. (2014). De las TIC a las TAC, un cambio significativo en el proceso educativo con tecnologías. Virtualidad, educación y ciencia, 5(9), 106-109. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/vesc/article/view/9926
Castro, P. (2005). Estrategia de integración de la alfabetización electrónica a la enseñanza-aprendizaje del inglés con fines específicos en la carrera de ingeniería agronómica [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad Central Martha Abreu De Las Villas].
Cavus, N. (2020). Evaluation of MoblrN m-learning system: Participants’ attitudes and opinions. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 12(3), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v12i3.4978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v12i3.4978
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., &Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (octava edición). Routledge.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (fourth edition). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative Research (fourth edition). Pearson Education, Inc.
Cruz, V. (2014). Nivel de competencias y actitudes hacia las TIC por parte de los docentes de los centros educativos en República Dominicana. Acercamiento a dos casos [Tesis de Maestría, Universidad de Salamanca].
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. l. (1967). The Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
González, M. P. (2020). Tecnologías del Aprendizaje y el Conocimiento para el Trabajo y Desarrollo Humano de los reincorporados del Espacio Territorial de Capacitación y Reincorporación de Tierra Grata, Cesar [Tesis de Maestría, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada]. Repositorio de la UMNG: http://hdl.handle.net/10654/36136.
Gorski, P. C. (2009). Insisting on Digital Equity: Reframing the Dominant Discourse on Multicultural Education and Technology. Urban Education, 44(3), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085908318712 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085908318712
Granado, M. (2019). Educación y exclusión digital: los falsos nativos digitales. Revista de Estudios Socioeducativos. ReSed, (7), 27-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_estud_socioeducativos.2019.i7.02
https://revistas.uca.es/index.php/ReSed/article/view/4404
Latorre, E. L., Castro, K. P., & Potes, I. D. (2018). Las TIC, las TAC y las TEP: Innovación educativa en la era conceptual. Universidad Sergio Arboleda. Repositorio de la USA https://repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co/handle/11232/1219
Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guildford Press.
Luque, F. (2016). Las TIC en educación: caminando hacia las TAC. 3C TIC. Cuadernos De Desarrollo Aplicados a Las TIC, 5(4), 55-62.
https://doi.org/10.17993/3ctic.2016.54.55-62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17993/3ctic.2016.54.55-62
Moya, M. (2013). De Las TICs a Las TACs. La Importancia De Crear Contenidos Educativos Digitales. DIM: Didáctica, Innovación Y Multimedia, (27), 1-15. http://dim.pangea.org/revistaDIM27/docs/AR27contenidosdigitalesmonicamoya.pdf
Mujica-Sequera, R. M. (2020). La Enseñanza Tecnoemocional en la Educación del Siglo XXI. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 9(2), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.147
Nivela, A. (2018). Tecnologías del Aprendizaje y Conocimiento (TAC) en el aprendizaje significativo de los estudiantes del octavo año de educación general básica jornada matutina de la unidad educativa “Provincia de Cotopaxi”. Diseño de software educativo. [Trabajo de pregrado, Universidad de Guayaquil]. Repositorio UG:
http://repositorio.ug.edu.ec/handle/redug/36947
Ñaupas, H., Mejía, E., Novoa, E., & Villagómez, A. (2014). Metodología de la investigación cuantitativa-cualitativa y redacción de la tesis (cuarta edición). Ediciones de la U.
Pérez-Cruz, D., Sánchez-López, F., Cocón-Juárez, J. F., & Zavaleta-Carrillo, P. (2020). La Influencia del WhatsApp en la Educación Superior de la UNACAR. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 9(2), 39-48.
https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.143
Salas, F. E. (2002). Epistemología, educación y tecnología educativa. Revista Educación, 26(1), 9-18. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/440/44026102.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v26i1.2873
Sandoval, C. H. (2020). La Educación en Tiempo del Covid-19 Herramientas TIC: El Nuevo Rol Docente en el Fortalecimiento del Proceso Enseñanza Aprendizaje de las Prácticas Educativa Innovadoras. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 9(2), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v9i2.138
San Martín-Cantero, D. (2014). Teoría fundamentada y Atlas.ti: recursos metodológicos para la investigación educativa. Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 16(1), 104-122. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1607-40412014000100008&lng=es&tlng=es.
Trujillo, C. A., Naranjo, M. E., Lomas, K. R., & Merlo, M. R. (2019). Investigación Cualitativa: Epistemología, Consentimiento Informado, Entrevistas en Profundidad (1ra ed.). Universidad Técnica del Norte.
Vera, G. M. & Sobenis, D. E. (2017). Las tecnologías de aprendizaje y Conocimientos (TACs) en el Rendimiento Académico. [Trabajo de pregrado, Universidad de Guayaquil]. Repositorio de la UG: http://repositorio.ug.edu.ec/handle/redug/25545
Verdecia, E., Enríquez, S. C., Gargiulo, S. B., Ponz, M. J., Scorians, E. E., Vernet, M. & Wenk, N. (2015). Information and comunications technologies in education. Curren achievements and future prospects. Revista Cubana de Educación Superior, 34(2), 4-17. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0257-43142015000200001&lng=es&tlng=en.
Vila, I. (2001). Lev S. Vigotsky: La psicología cultural y la construcción de la persona desde la educación. En Trilla, J. (coord.), Cano, E., Carretero, M., Escofet, A., Fairstein, G., Fernández, J. A., González, J., Gros, B., Imbernón, F., Lorenzo, N., Monés, J., Muset, M., Pla, M., Puig, J. M., Rodríguez, J. L., Solà, P. Tort, A., & Vila, I. El legado pedagógico del siglo XX para la escuela del siglo XXI (pp.207-227). Editorial Graó, de IRIF, S.L.
Zabala, C., Camacho, H., & Chávez, S. (2013). Tendencias epistemológicas predominantes en el aprendizaje de las TIC en el área de la educación. TELOS. Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Ciencias Sociales, 15(2), 178-194. https://biblat.unam.mx/es/revista/telos-revista-de-estudios-interdisciplinarios-en-ciencias-sociales/articulo/tendencias-epistemologicas-predominantes-en-el-aprendizaje-de-las-tic-en-el-area-de-la-educacion