Communication and Interaction Model for e-Learning Courses in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v15i1.280
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Communication and interaction through virtual courses. Higher education has chosen to offer courses both in face-to-face mode and in a virtual manner to provide a broad panorama of the educational field. The objective of this research has been, on the one hand, to highlight the importance of integrating a counseling plan through interaction and communication between teacher and student in e-learning courses and the other hand, to detect the problems that exist with the exercise. The descriptive method was used under the positivist paradigm, with a quantitative approach, experimental design, and correlational type to demonstrate the instrument type questionnaire with 53 items. The measurement scale used in the questions was a 5-point Likert scale with the variables of interaction and follow-up, and advice. This questionnaire was applied to professors of the Faculty of Informatics of the Autonomous University of Querétaro. For the processing and analysis of the data, the measurement of Cronbach's Alpha was used, which resulted in 0.947, being reliable to continue with the investigation. The results showed an absence in the implementation of advisory plans to address student doubts, being an essential factor within the monitoring variable. This leads to the proposal of communication and interaction strategies between teacher and student to develop an excellent teaching-learning process.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Aldahdouh, T. Z., Nokelainen, P., & Korhonen, V. (2020). Technology and Social Media Usage in Higher Education: The Influence of Individual Innovativeness. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899441
Aparicio, O. & Abadía, C. (2019). La investigación en la educación. Revista Interamericana de Investigación, Educación y Pedagogía, RIIEP, 12(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/s1657-107X DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/s1657-107X.2019.0001.03
Area, M., & Adell, J. (2009). La docencia virtual en las universidades presenciales. Revista Iberoamericana de educación a distancia. 10(2).
Barroso, J., Gutiérrez, J. J., Llorente, M. C., & Ortiz, R. V. (2019). Difficulties in the incorporation of augmented reality in university education: Visions from the experts. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.7.409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.7.409
Boneu, J. M. (2007). Plataformas abiertas de e-learning para el soporte de contenidos educativos abiertos. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento. http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v4i1.298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v4i1.298
Cavazos, S. R. & Torres, F. S. (2016). Diagnóstico del uso de las tecnologías en el proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje en la educación superior. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 7(13). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v7i13.249
Ferreres, V. & González A. (2006). Evaluación para la mejora de los centros docentes. Praxis.
Forbes, D. (2017). Professional online presence and learning networks: Educating for ethical use of social media. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(7), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.2826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.2826
Flores, O?., & Del Arco, I. (2012). The Impact of ICTs on Lecturer and Student Interaction in University Education Processes. RUSC. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad Del Conocimiento, 9(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v9i2.1243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v9i2.1243
García, F. J., & Seoane, A. M. (2015). Una revisión actualizada del concepto de eLearning. Décimo Aniversario. Education in the Knowledge Society, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2015161119144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2015161119144
Go?mez-Gala?n, J. (2017). Interacciones Moodle-MOOC: presente y futuro de los modelos de e-learning y b-learning en los contextos universitarios. EccoS. Revista Científica, 44, 241–257. https://doi.org/10.5585/eccos.n44.7353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/eccos.n44.7353
Fernández, C., Baptista, P., & Hernández Sampieri, R. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación. McGraw Hill.
León, A. P., Risco, V. E. & Alarcón S. C. (2004). Estrategias de aprendizaje en educación superior en un modelo curricular por competencias. Revista de la educación superior, 43(172), 123-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2015.03.012
Marcelo, C, Ballesteros M. A., & Palazón A. (2002). E-learning teleformación. Diseño, desarrollo y evaluación de la formación a través de Internet. Gestión 2000.
Ostos, O. & Cortés, M. (2019). Los campos de acción en la Universidad Santo Tomás. Resultados del estudio 2012 - 2018. Revista Interamericana de Investigación, Educación y Pedagogía, RIIEP, 12(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/s1657-107X DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/s1657-107X.2019.0001.01
Pinto, M., Gómez, C., Fernández, A. & Doucet, A. (2017). Evaluareed: desarrollo de una herramienta para la evaluación de la calidad de los recursos educativos electrónicos. Investigación bibliotecológica, 31(72), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.2017.72 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.2017.72.57831
Tamayo y Tamayo, M. (2009). El proceso de la investigación científica incluye evaluación y administración de proyectos de investigación. Limusa.
Únete a nuestro canal de Telegram para recibir notificaciones de nuestras publicaciones
