Control in Public Contracting DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v16i2.395
Main Article Content
Abstract
Public sector procurement represents a significant part of the budgets of most countries; and, sometimes, these procedures are permeated by practices that raise concerns regarding the integrity and transparency of these processes, which has an adverse impact on the quality of life of citizens, by diverting resources that were intended for the progress and development of the country. The purpose of this research was to analyze the control in public procurement. The research was based on the inductive method, positivist paradigm, with qualitative approach, non-experimental design, descriptive type. A bibliographic review of scientific productions of national and international indexing journals was carried out and the documentary analysis guide was used as an instrument. The review identified that about 30% of institutions use environmental processes, risk, information systems and control and monitoring activities to efficiently manage public resources. The study highlights the relevance of control in public procurement as a fundamental component for a more efficient management of public resources.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Balaeva, O., Rodionova, Y., Yakovlev, A., & Tkachenko, A. (2021). Public Procurement Efficiency as Perceived by Market Participants: The Case of Russia. International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1964083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3886504
Becerra, M. (2016). El tribunal de contrataciones del estado en el periodo 2012-2014. Revista Derecho & Sociedad, (44), 353-363. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/14417/15031
Bento, L. V. (2019). Aplicación de inteligencia artificial y big data en el control de la administración pública y en el combate a la corrupción: la experiencia del gobierno brasileño. Revista General de Derecho Administrativo, (50)
Bravo, E. D. (2020). The Italian public procurement’ remedies system: Procedures and litigiousness’ control | El sistema de recursos en la contratación pública italiana: Procedimientos y control de litigiosidad. Revista General de Derecho Administrativo, 54, 1–28.
Castañeda, V. (2016). Una investigación sobre la corrupción publica y sus determinantes. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y sociales, 61(227), 103-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-1918(16)30023-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-1918(16)30023-X
Castillo, M. & Sabroso, R. (2019). Los árbitros y el deber de revelación en la ley de contrataciones del Estado y sus reglamentos. Revista Derecho y Sociedad, (44), 245-255. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/14408
Das Graças Pinto, J. H., & Maceno, M. M. C. (2021). Sustainable Procurement Process: A Case Study at a Public Higher Education Institution in Brazil. In World Sustainability Series. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59975-1_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59975-1_4
Dávila, P., Villacis, G., León, R., & González, M. (2021). Corruption in Public Contracts: Improvement of Control Through Quality Management Tools. In Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1485 CCIS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 90241-4_35
Dmytryshyn, B., Zhovnovach, R., Levchenko, O., Malakhovskyi, Y., & Gonchar, V. (2018). Practical aspects of assessing the efficiency of the modern system of public procurement in Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(2), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.32
Effio, A. (2015). La falsa reforma de la normativa de contrataciones del Estado: Instituciones, incertidumbre y vaguedades. Revista Derecho & Sociedad, (44), 109-119. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/14393
Elalaoui Elabdallaoui, H., Elfazziki, A., & Sadgal, M. (2021). A Blockchain-Based Platform for the e-Procurement Management in the Public Sector. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): 12732 LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78428-7_17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78428-7_17
Fourie, D., & Malan, C. (2020). Public procurement in the South African economy: Addressing the systemic issues. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(20), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208692
Franco, B. (2015). El carácter vinculante de las opiniones del organismo supervisor de las contrataciones del estado. Revista Derecho & Sociedad, (44), 391-402. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/14420
Gamboa, J., Puente, S. & Vera, P. (2016). Importancia del control interno en el sector público. Revista Publicando, 3(8), 487-502. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5833405
Granheimer, K., Gustavsson, T. K., & Eriksson, P. E. (2021). Public procurement of engineering services: Governance and control mechanisms. Proceedings of the 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, ARCOM 2021, 470–479.
Grossi, G., & Pianezzi, D. (2018). The new public corruption: Old questions for new challenges. Accounting Forum, 42(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.05.002
Gutiérrez, E. (2018). Corrupción publica: concepto y mediciones. Hacia el Public compliance como herramienta de prevención de riesgos penales. Política Criminal, 13(25), 104-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992018000100104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-33992018000100104
Jarrín López, W. B., Peña Suárez, D., Navas Espín, G. R., & Silva Álvarez, N. D. (2021). Control actions for risk prevention in emergency situations in the public sector | Acciones de control para prevención de riesgos en situaciones de emergencia en el sector público. Universidad y Sociedad, 13(s1), 319–327.
Kaletnik, H., & Zdyrko, N. (2019). Public procurement in Ukraine as a state governance instrument: Evaluation, control, improvement. Economic Annals, 21(179), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V179-07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V179-07
Kolosova, A., & Zilinskiene, I. (2021). Managing km in the public sector: The case of the public procurement process. Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM, 431–439. https://doi.org/10.34190/EKM.21.034
Mendoza, W., García, T., Delgado, M. & Barreiro, I. (2018). El control interno y su influencia en la gestión administrativa del sector público. Dominio de las Ciencias, 4(4), 206-240. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6656251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23857/dc.v4i4.835
Milosavljevic, M., Radovanovic, S. & delibasic, B. (2021). Evaluation of public procurement efficiency of the EU countries using preference learning topsis method. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics studies and Research, 55(3), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.24818/18423264/55.3.21.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/18423264/55.3.21.12
Munteanu, I., Grigorescu, A., Condrea, E., & Pelinescu, E. (2020). Convergent insights for sustainable development and ethical cohesion: An empirical study on corporate governance in Romanian Public Entities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072990
Padreschi, W. (2015). Aproximaciones al régimen de contrataciones directas en la nueva ley de contrataciones del Estado. Revista Derecho & Sociedad, (44), 163- 174. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/14398/15013
Pastrana, A. (2019). Estudio sobre la corrupción en América Latina. Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública, (27), 13-40. https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2019.27.68726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484911e.2019.27.68726
Perevezentceva, E. V., Osipova, K. I., & Skrynnikova, K. Y. (2021). Corruption in the Implementation of Public Procurement from Small and Medium Businesses. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 280. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80485- 5_104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80485-5_104
Pot, W. D. (2021). The governance challenge of implementing long-term sustainability objectives with present-day investment decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124475
Psota, V., Chyzhevska, L., Osychka, O., Zaika, S., & Koval, N. (2020). Competition in public procurement in the fight against corruption: Analysis of an example of Ukraine. Intellectual Economics, 14(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.13165/IE-20-14-1-06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13165/IE-20-14-1-06
Quinaluisa, N., Ponce, V., Muñoz, C., Ortega, X. & Pérez, J. (2018). El control interno y sus herramientas de aplicación COSO y COCO. Cofín Habana, 12(1), 268-283. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2073-60612018000100018#:~:text=Las%20herramientas%20de%20aplicaci%C3%B3n%20de,y%20uso%20inadecuado%20o%20il%C3%ADcito.
Rey, A., Gomez, L., & Lozada, A. (2018). Application of Crowdsourcing to Generate Datasets of Public Procurement Processes. MATEC Web of Conferences, 210. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821004050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821004050
Rivas, F., Asprino, M., Sarache, J. & León, F. (2019). Sistema inteligente para la generación automática de contratos en el marco de contrataciones públicas. Revista Politécnica, 44(1), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.33333/rp.vol44n1.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33333/rp.vol44n1.05
Santos, J. B., & Cabral, S. (2021). Public procurement capabilities as engines for collaboration and enhanced performance in complex projects. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-02-2021-0098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-02-2021-0098
Sharma, S. K., Sengupta, A., & Panja, S. C. (2019). Mapping Corruption Risks in Public Procurement: Uncovering Improvement Opportunities and Strengthening Controls. Public Performance and Management Review, 42(4), 947–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1535984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1535984
Ticha, A., Nowak, J., & Mrnova, Z. (2019). Model Example of Small-Scale Public Contracts Evaluation in the Czech Republic. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/2/022018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/2/022018
Zegarra, J. (2015). Modificación al contrario en la normativa de contrataciones del Estado (Ley 30225). Revista Derecho & Sociedad, (44), 191-202. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/14401
Zulaikha, Basuki Hadiprajitno, P. T., Rohman, A., & Handayani, S. (2021). Effect of attitudes, subjective norms and behavioral controls on the intention and corrupt behavior in public procurement: Fraud triangle and the planned behavior in management accounting. Accounting, 7(2), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.11.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.11.020