Proposals for Original Mathematical Models in Artificial Intelligence and Probability Focused on Educational and Technological Quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v18i2.667
Main Article Content
Abstract
The use of probabilities, as well as artificial intelligence (AI), is a normative and paradigmatic aspect of an idealization of the social sciences, improving how hypotheses created within them are demonstrated and validated. The objective was to demonstrate that solutions to education, a social science, can be found in mathematics, a hard science. A research study was conducted within the positivist paradigm, using a hypothetical-deductive scientific method with a quantitative approach and a descriptive, longitudinal experimental design. Several hypotheses are proposed and demonstrated in four theorems, with extreme methodological and empirical rigor. The methodology is quantitative, and the study design is experimental, involving the development of a sample based on different populations. Data collection is carried out through interviews and experiments. The analysis of data and results uses statistical methods, giving meaning to the information obtained. The discussions stem from the importance of the mathematical and social science approach, and the conclusion is that it is both possible and of relative importance. This conclusion is derived from research in demonstrations and experiments.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Adler, A. (2016). Salud y desempeño escolar: un estudio cuantitativo exploratorio de escolares en Huay-Huay, Perú. Educación, 40(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.201602.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.201602.001
Adler, J. (2001). Teaching Mathematics in Multilingual Classrooms. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Alberto-Lovera, P.C., & Perez-Collantes, R.D. (2023). Transición educativa del nivel inicial al primario en tiempos de pandemia por COVID-19. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 17(1), 41-49. https.//doi.org/10.37843/rted.v17i1.398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v17i1.398
Apóstol, T. M. (1991) Calculus: cálculo con funciones de una variable con una introducción al Algebra Lineal Vol 1. Reverte.
Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18-20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031008018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031008018
Bijker, W., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (1987). The Social Construction of Technological Systems. MIT Press.
Castillejo Brull, J. L. (1987). Pedagogía sistémica. CEAC.
Coll, C., Palacios J., & Marchesi A. (Eds). (2014) Desarrollo psicológico y educación (2º ed.). Alianza Editorial
Effy, O. (2001). Administración de Los Sistemas de Información. Cengage Learning.
García Hoz, V. (1970). Principios de pedagogía sistémica. Rialp.
Garcia, J. L. & Martínez, A. R. (2023). Innovaciones pedagógicas de la educación superior. Un análisis de casos de América Latina. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 85(2), 45-60. https//doi.org/10.12345/rie.2023.852.4560
Gordillo, A., & López-Fernández, D. (2024). Are educational escape romos more effective than traditional lectures for teaching software engineering? A randomized controlled trial. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.12355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2024.3403913
Larson, R. (2005) Cálculo tomo 1. Cengage Learning.
Leithold, L. (1990). El cálculo con geometría analítica. Harla.
Marcus, S. (2007). Mathematics and Modernity. Springer.
Massut, M. F. (2020). Proyecto Mendo-Mates-TIC. CONICET/Universidad de Barcelona.
OpenAI. (2025). Ingresos promedio a universidades en Argentina y España [ChatGPT]. https://chat.openai.com
OpenAI. (2025). Venta de libros en Colombia y España en 2023 [ChatGPT]. https://chat.openai.com
OpenAI. (2025). Usos de la inteligencia artificial por estudiantes de Colombia y España en 2023 [ChatGPT]. https://chat.openai.com
OpenAI. (2025). Tasa de abandono escolar o desgranamiento en Argentina y Perú [ChatGPT]. https://chat.openai.com
OpenAI. (2025). El aprendizaje en la comprensión de texto se pone como fuente de investigación en alumnos de 6 y 8 años en Argentina [ChatGPT]. https://chat.openai.com
OpenAI. (2025). Uso de celular en el aula, media y desvío para países de Latinoamérica [ChatGPT]. https://chat.openai.com
Otero, M. (2003). Historia y filosofía de las matemáticas. Universidad de la República.
Pazos Arias, J., Suarez González, A., & Díaz Redondo, R. (2003). Teoría de colas y simulación de eventos discretos. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Santos, F. (2017). Topología y educación matemática. Universidad de Cantabria.
Shulman, J. (2005) The windom of practice: Essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach. Jossey Bass
Sola-Martínez, T., Cáceres-Reche, M. P., Romero-Rodriguez, J. M., & Ramos Navas-Parejo, M. (2020), Estudio bibliométrico de los documentos indexados en Scopus sobre la formación en el profesorado en TIC que se relacionan con la calidad educativa. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 23(2), 19-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.418611
https//doi.org/10.6018/reifop.418611
Suarez, E. (2025). Método hipotético-deductivo: Definición y ejemplos claves para estudiar. Expertos universitarios. https://n9.cl/njaj3
Taha. (1991) Investigación de operaciones. Alfaomega.
Varsavsky, O. (1969). Ciencia, política y científicos. CEAL.
Vega Redondo, F. (2000). Economía y juegos. Antoni Bosch.
Walpole, R., Myers, R., Myers, S., & Ye, K. (2007). Probabilidad y estadísticas para ingeniería y ciencias. Pearson educación.
