Development of Information Management Skills in Teaching-Learning Processes with ICT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v18i2.712
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In today's digital age, information literacy (IL) has become essential for academic and professional success. This environment is characterized by a vast amount of data and a wide variety of digital sources, requiring students to acquire skills in searching for, evaluating, organizing, and using information effectively. The objective of this study was to adapt the phases of the Gavilán Model into a methodology focused on strengthening IL, thereby improving students' cognitive skills in comprehension, meaningful retention, and conceptual synthesis. The research was framed within the hermeneutic paradigm, with a qualitative approach, an interpretive method, and a narrative design of a literary and cross-sectional nature. The population consisted of students from primary school (5th grade), secondary school (10th and 11th grades), and higher education institutions (first-semester students in the Software Development Technology program), all recognized by the Colombian Ministry of National Education (MEN). In addition, academic and pedagogical documents published between 2018 and 2024 were reviewed. As a result, a technological tool was designed, organized around the four phases of the Gavilán Model, which guides students in constructing key concepts through activities that include searching for, analyzing, and synthesizing information. The proposal proved effective in promoting critical thinking, decision-making, autonomous learning, and the responsible use of information in different educational contexts.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Andrade, C. V. (2024). ¿Qué dificultades enfrentan los docentes y estudiantes con el uso de la tecnología? [Revista FP] https://n9.cl/40wor
Area Moreira, M. (2010). ¿Per què cal formar en competències informacionals i digitals en l’ensenyament superior?. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal. 7(2). https://doi.org/10.7238/RUSC.V7I2.976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v7i2.976
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2
Castells, M. (2024). Advanced introduction to digital society. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Colás-Bravo, P., Conde-Jiménez, J., & Reyes-de-Cózar, S. (2019). The development of the digital teaching competence from a sociocultural approach. El desarrollo de la competencia digital docente desde un enfoque sociocultural. Comunicar, 61, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.3916/C61-2019-02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C61-2019-02
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5a ed.). SAGE Publications.
Eduteka. (2023). Modelo Gavilán: propuesta para el desarrollo de la Competencia para Manejar Información. Fundación Gabriel Piedrahita Uribe. https://n9.cl/e7yw0
Enworo, O. C. (2023). Application of Guba and Lincoln’s parallel criteria to assess trustworthiness of qualitative research on indigenous social protection systems. Qualitative Research Journal, 23(4), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2022-0116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2022-0116
Folgueiras-Bertomeu, P., & Sandín-Esteban, M. P. (2023). The research question in hermeneutic phenomenology and grounded theory research. The Qualitative Report, 28(5), 1452–1472. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5715
Fronm Cea, L. M. (2024). El impacto de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación en la sociedad [Ceabad Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Banda Ancha para el Desarrollo]. https://n9.cl/hdb4b
Gadamer, H. G. (2001). Verdad y método. Ediciones Sígueme.
García Bravo, W., & Martín Sánchez, M. A. (2022). Hermenéutica y pedagogía: La práctica educativa en el discurso sobre la educación. Pulso. Revista de Educación, 45, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.58265/pulso.5059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58265/pulso.5059
Griffin, P. & Care, E. (2014). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Methods and Approach. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7
Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services (2nd ed.). Libraries Unlimited.
Lincoln, Y., &. Guba, E. (1985). Postpositivism and the Naturalist Paradigm. Sage
Londoño Pardo, Ó. I., Arbeláez Linares, M. P., & Mateus, J. C. (2024). Creencias, actitudes y comportamientos de los estudiantes universitarios de la Comunidad Andina ante la desinformación. Cuadernos.Info, (60), 168–189. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.60.86100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.60.86100
Mielityinen-Pachmann, M., & Uljens, M. (2023). Hermeneutics in the non-affirmative theory of education. En M. Uljens (Ed.), Non-affirmative theory of education and Bildung. Springer, 20, 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30551-1_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30551-1_9
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2015). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. ResearchGate. https://n9.cl/4ytlf
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). Skills Strategy 2019. Skills to Shape a Better Future. OECD https://doi.org/10.1787/e3527cfb-es. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/e3527cfb-es
Pradeep, R. M. M., & Wijesekera, N. T. S. (2019). Literature evaluation criteria. ResearchGate. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.23148.51840/1
Portillo Torres, M. C. (2017). Educación por habilidades: Perspectivas y retos para el sistema educativo. Revista Educación, 41(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v41i2.21719 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v41i2.21719
Rivas Villena, J. A., Uribe-Tirado, A., López-Mesa, E. K., & Limaymanta, C. H. (2021). Alfabetización informacional en Bibliotecología y Ciencias de la Información: Un análisis bibliométrico en el ámbito latinoamericano (2001-2020). Información, Cultura y Sociedad, 45, 95-112. https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i45.10433 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i45.10433
Romero-Tena, R., Llorente Cejudo, C., & Palacios Rodríguez, A. (2021). Competencias digitales docentes desarrolladas por el alumnado del Grado en Educación Infantil: presencialidad vs virtualidad. EDUTEC. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 76, 109-125. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2021.76.207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2021.76.2071
Toala Ponce, S. R., Gómez Pinillo, L. Y., Guevara Heredia, R. N., & Quiñonez Ortiz, E. C. (2022). Application of Bloom’s taxonomy to improve teaching-learning. Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(6), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v3i6.507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v3i6.507
Uribe-Tirado, A. (2007). Los bibliotecólogos colombianos y la adquisición de competencias: Énfasis y tendencias en la actual formación en tecnologías de la información y la comunicación. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 30, 135-166. https://n9.cl/1m3k3
Virginia Tech Library Guides. (2024). Evaluating sources: criteria for relevance, reliability, currency, and more. BCHM 1014 Research Resources. Virginia Tech Library. https://n9.cl/6gvjw
Únete a nuestro canal de Telegram para recibir notificaciones de nuestras publicaciones
