The Technological-Educational Journal Docentes 2.0 (TEDJ) shares and promotes the guidelines of ethics and good editorial practices of the COPE (Committee of Publication Ethics), thus guaranteeing transparency and integrity in all processes by the journal's editorial team, as well as their collaborators in the roles of authors and evaluators.

The Technological-Educational Journal Docentes 2.0 (TEDJ)  speaks out against bad practices carried out by authors, editors, or reviewers, intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly, such as plagiarism, self-plagiarism, excessive self-citation, exchange citation, fragmentation of research, redundant publication, fabrication or falsification of information, manipulation of citation, altered images, duplication of the content of an article due to a simultaneous submission to another journal, null citation between two linked articles, non-protection of subjects or study participants, undeserved authorship, academic, personal, financial, political, or commercial conflicts of interest, citation enforcement, publication bias, inappropriate review when the editor improperly selected the referee, or the incompetence or lack of commitment of the reviewer. Reviewer to evaluate manuscripts.

Suppose any of these practices are identified through access to information on the internet. In that case, the review process, the use of anti-plagiarism software, and/or the anonymous complaint will result in suspending or modifying the evaluation process or the retraction or modification of an article already published, where appropriate, following the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics and the American Psychological Association.

The Technological-Educational Journal Docentes 2.0 (TEDJ)  reports its adherence to the international standard and code of ethics established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (Code of Conduct and Best Practices Guidelines for Journals Editors, COPE). Explanatory text through the following link: https://publicationethics.org/files/Code%20of%20Conduct.pdf 

Likewise, the journal makes its code of ethics available for particular guidance according to the role on the following page: Code of ethics.