Scientific Literacy: Indispensable Tool in the Digital Age DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v11i1.181
Main Article Content
Abstract
When reflecting on the term literacy, individuals immediately imagine a subject without minimum literacy skills. This article was conceived to study the importance of generating knowledge in the 21st century. It arose from the antagonism that experts should only publish scientific publications. For the study's undertaking, a multidisciplinary approach was maintained, where different perspectives were incorporated and conceptions about Social Sciences, psychology, citizen, social and pedagogical participation. Qualitative research of the phenomenological-hermeneutic method was carried out. Ten (10) social actors of the International Workshop of Writing Scientific Articles were interviewed to structure, codify, and categorize the results. This epistemic journey allowed a theoretical approach focused on the literacy of social actors to generate knowledge through meaningful science education. Based on the social actors' voice, it was established the tearing of each editorial's bureaucratic chains because the experience is more accessible in the digital era. However, illiteracy has spread rapidly, incited by the old school groups, creating confusion in the events, and expanding their hegemony. Therefore, scientific literacy (SLC) is not only focused on the common factor of scientific activity of how, but also the strengthening of science through Higher Education Institutions, research groups, organizations, and educational enterprises.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L. & Lederman, N.G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807)82:4<417::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E
Aguilar, T. (1999). Alfabetización científica y educación para la ciudadanía. Narcea Ediciones.
Aguirre, J., & Jaramillo, L. (2013). Tesis de la carga teórica de la observación y constructivismo. Cinta de Moebio, 47, 74-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2013000200002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2013000200002
Alfonso-Sánchez, I (2001). El arte de escribir. Acimed, 9(2),7-85. http://www.bvs.sld.cu/revistas/aci/vol9_2_02/aci01201.html
Bolio, A. (2012). Husserl y la fenomenología trascendental: Perspectivas del sujeto en las ciencias del siglo XX. Reencuentro, (65). http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=34024824004
Caamaño, A; Gómez-Crespo, M. A.; Gutiérrez-Julián, M. S; Llopis, R. & Martín-Díaz, M.J., (2001). El Proyecto Química Salters: un enfoque ciencia, tecnología, sociedad para la química del bachillerato, en Enseñanza de las ciencias desde la perspectiva Ciencia/Tecnología/Sociedad. Formación científica para la ciudadanía. Narcea.
Cassany, D. (1995). La cocina de la escritura. Editorial Anagrama.
Celaya, J. (2011). Escasa creación original, colaborativa, participativa. Telos, Cuadernos de Comunicación e Innovación, n.º 89. https://publiadmin.fundaciontelefonica.com/index.php/publicaciones/add_descargas?tipo_fichero=pdf&idioma_fichero=_&title=TELOS+88&code=256&lang=es&file=telos_88_.pdf
Feldman, S., Anderson, V. & Mangurian, L. (2001). Teaching effective scientific writing. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(7), 446-450.
Ferry G. (1997). Pedagogía de la formación. Ediciones Novedades Educativas y Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Foucault, M. (1970). La arqueología del saber. Siglo XXI.
Furió, C., Vilches, A., Guisasola, J. & Romo, V. (2001). Finalidades de la enseñanza de las ciencias en la Secundaria Obligatoria. ¿Alfabetización científica o preparación propedéutica? Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 19(3), 365-376.
Gopen, G. & Swan, J. (1990). The Science of scientific writing. http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/23947?fulltext=true&print=yes
Heidegger, M. (2006). Introducción a la fenomenología de la religión. Ediciones Siruela.
Husserl, E. (1998). Invitación a la fenomenología. Paidós.
Jerz, D. (2000). Top five problems. http://jerz.setonhill.edu/writing/technical/resume/tips.htm
Laugksch, R.C. (2000). Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual Overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C
Lerner, N. & Ogren-Balkama, M. (2007). Teaching scientific http://appl003.lsu.edu/acadaff/cxcweb.nsf/$Content/Summer+Institute+Materials/ $file/SI_05--Lerner--Writing_1.pdf
Martín-Díaz, M.J. (2001). Enseñanza de las ciencias ¿para qué?, Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, vol.1, n.2. 2002. http://www.saum.uvigo.es/reec/volumenes.htm
Martínez, M. (1996). Investigación cualitativa. El comportamiento humano. (2ª ed.). Trillas.
McConney A., Oliver M.C., Woods-McConney A., Schibeci R. & Maor D. (2014). Inquiry, Engagement, and Literacy in Science: A Retrospective, Cross-National Analysis Using PISA 2006. Science Education 98(6), 963-980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21135
Moya, J. (2003). El lenguaje científico y la lectura comprensiva en el área de ciencias. Gobierno de Navarra Departamento de Educación y Cultura.
Olmedo-Estrada, J. C. (2011). Educación y divulgación de la Ciencia: tendiendo puentes hacia la alfabetización científica. Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza Y Divulgación De Las Ciencias, 8(2), 137-148. https://revistas.uca.es/index.php/eureka/article/view/2703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2011.v8.i2.01
Rizo-Patrón, R. (2015). Superveniencia o nacimiento trascendental. Ápeiron: Estudios de filosofía: Filosofía y fenomenología, (3), 381-397. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5966462
Romberger, J. (2000). Teaching scientific writing conventions: Learning to write is an integral part of writing to learn in the Sciences. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/WAC/abstract.html
San Martín, J. (1986). La estructura del método fenomenológico. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
Sternberg, R. & Lubart T. (1997). La creatividad en una cultura conformista. Editorial Paidós.