Job Performance and Technostress in Virtual English Teaching DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v16i2.414
Main Article Content
Abstract
This essay's main objective is to analyze technostress's impact on Peruvian university professors' job performance in the post-pandemic scenario, considering the integration of ICT as a relevant factor in this issue. It has methodological support in the deductive method, positivist paradigm, qualitative approach, descriptive type, and topical narrative design. A thorough review of the scientific literature will be conducted, exploring the phenomenon of technostress and its implications on the psychological well-being of university teachers. Factors contributing to technostress, such as information overload, constant interruptions, insufficient technological competence, technological dependence, and technical difficulties, will be identified. Considering the impact of technostress on the psychological well-being of university teachers, it is essential to promote self-care and emotional well-being strategies in the educational environment. This involves raising awareness about the limits of technology use, establishing regular breaks during the workday, promoting digital disconnection outside working hours, and providing psychological support and stress management training. As a final argument, knowing the impact of technostress on the psychological well-being of university teachers, it is essential to promote self-care and emotional well-being strategies, develop digital skills, and implement strategies to manage technostress. This way, it will be possible to ensure quality education, create a conducive environment for student learning, and guarantee the well-being of teachers in the post-pandemic context.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Arredondo-Hidalgo, M. G., & Caldera-González, D. (2022). Tecnoestrés en estudiantes universitarios. Diagnóstico en el marco del COVID-19 en México. Educación y Humanismo, 24(42), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.24.42.4491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.24.42.4491
Bakker, A., & Demerouti, E. (2013). La teoría de las demandas y los recursos laborales. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 29(3), 107-115. https://dx.doi.org/10.5093/tr2013a16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2013a16
Bernal, C. (2010). Metodología de la investigación: Administración, economía, humanidades y ciencias sociales (3.ª ed.). Pearson Educación de Colombia Ltda.
Betancourt, Y. (2022). Factores socioeducativos en el tecnoestrés en docentes de instituciones educativas de Lima, 2020-2022. [Tesis doctoral, Universidad César Vallejo]. https://n9.cl/pwq7u
Carrasco-Ascencio, E. A. (2021). Medición de la relación del tecnoestrés y sus factores sobre la satisfacción laboral y compromiso organizacional en Oriencoop para evaluar los efectos de la virtualización completa de la empresa. [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Talca (Chile), Instituto de Innovación Basado en Ciencia].
Coppari, N., Bagnoli, L., Codas, G., López, H., Martínez, U., Martínez, L., & Montanía, M. (2018). Validez y confiabilidad del cuestionario de tecnoestrés en estudiantes paraguayos. Perspectivas en Psicología: Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines, 15(2), 40-55. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4835/483558849004/html/
Danielson, C. (2011). Competencias docentes: desarrollo, apoyo y evaluación. Santiago: Programa de Promoción de la Reforma Educativa en América Latina y el Caribe (Preal).
Ferreira, O., & d’Angelo, M. (2021). Technological stress and the intention to stay in organizations: ¿Do the quality of life and work-home conflict mediate this relationship? Contextus, 19(1), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2021.62600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2021.62600
Fernández-Martínez, S. F. (2020). Los riesgos psicosociales en el trabajo realizado mediante plataformas digitales. IUSLabor. Revista d'anàlisi de Dret del Treball, (3). https://www.raco.cat/index.php/IUSLabor/article/view/373350
Hernández-Sampieri, R. & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. Mcgraw - Hill Interamericana Editores. http://repositorio.uasb.edu.bo:8080/handle/54000/1292
Losada, A. V., & Lanuque, A. (2021). Tecnoestrés en ambientes universitarios y su impacto en la ansiedad adolescente. Actualidad Psicológica, 46(507), 7-10. https://n9.cl/btmws
López, J. I. H., Rubio, M. I. S., & Castillo, M. Á. R. (2021). Teletrabajo y tecnoestrés en organizaciones educativas: aprendizajes ante la pandemia por la COVID-19 en México. Contaduría y Administración, 66(5), 3. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8294178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2021.3305
Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695-706. https://n9.cl/hqwuu DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.165
Madero-Gómez, S. (2019). Factores de la teoría de Herzberg y el impacto de los incentivos en la satisfacción de los trabajadores. Acta Universitaria, 29. https://n9.cl/fpbp6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2019.2153
Nina-Cuchillo, J., Nina-Cuchillo, E., & Sánchez-Aguirre, F. (2021). Use of ICT and Autonomous Learning of University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic. En 2021 Machine Learning-Driven Digital Technologies for Educational Innovation Workshop (pp. 1-5). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9733759 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEECONF53024.2021.9733759
Parra-Medina, L. E., & Álvarez-Cervera, F. J. (2021). Síndrome de la sobrecarga informativa: una revisión bibliográfica. Revista de Neurología, 73(12). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34877645/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7312.2021113
Prieto-Quezada, M. T., Romero-Sánchez, A., & Oliva, H. (2023). Adicción a las TIC. Perspectiva docente desde tres centros universitarios. Alteridad, 18(1), 48-58. https://n9.cl/kybdu3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v18n1.2023.04
Salanova, M. (2003). Trabajando con tecnologías y afrontando el tecnoestrés: el rol de las creencias de eficacia. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 19(3), 225-246. https://n9.cl/sxgk9
Salanova, M., & Nadal, M. (2002). Sobre el concepto y medida del tecnoestrés: una revisión. Repositori Universitat Jaume I. https://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/handle/10234/79668
Sánchez, F., Alcaide-Aranda, L., Castañeda, E., Ludeña, G., & Toledo, P. (2022). Strategy Diagram of Active Research in Practice and Research in Higher Education Students. NeuroQuantology, 20(5), 554-560. https://n9.cl/9smq8
Sanchis, S. (2020). Teoría de las expectativas de Vroom: fórmula y ejemplos. [Psicologia-online.com]. https://n9.cl/0cjj4
Sarabadani, J., Carter, M., & Compeau, D. (2018). 10 Years of research on technostress creators and inhibitors: Synthesis and critique. En AMCIS 2018 - America's Conference on Information Systems. (p. 1-10). https://n9.cl/ywfja
Sellberg, C., & Susi, T. (2014). Technostress in the office: A distributed cognition perspective on human technology interaction. Cognition, Technology & Work, 16(2), 187-201. https://n9.cl/5hctk DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-013-0256-9
Tacy, J. (2016). Technostress: A concept analysis. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 20(2). https://n9.cl/4sqbh
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328. https://n9.cl/1qhqu DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
Wang, K., Shu, Q., & Tu, Q. (2008). Technostress under different organizational environments: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 3002-3013. https://n9.cl/2imcl2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.007