El Aporte de las Estrategias de Lectura Inferencial para Mejorar la Habilidad de Comprensión Lectora en un Contexto de Clase Privada en Línea DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v17i2.509
Main Article Content
Abstract
En respuesta a la creciente importancia de las estrategias efectivas de aprendizaje en línea, el siguiente estudio tuvo como objetivo explorar la contribución de las estrategias de lectura inferencial para mejorar las habilidades de comprensión lectora dentro de un marco de aprendizaje en línea. La investigación se basó en el modelo de investigación-acción, utilizando un enfoque mixto que recopila datos cuantitativos y cualitativos en cuatro estudiantes de entre 16 y 18 años recibieron instrucción de lectura estratégica durante cuatro sesiones. Al emplear pruebas pre y post junto con entrevistas semiestructuradas, el estudio evaluó tanto los aspectos cuantitativos como cualitativos de la comprensión y percepciones de los participantes. Los resultados indicaron una mejora notable en la comprensión lectora inferencial tanto a nivel grupal como individual, aunque con algunas inconsistencias en el rendimiento en ítems específicos. Los participantes demostraron una sólida comprensión de las estrategias de aprendizaje, inferencia y su aplicación en tareas de comprensión. Además, enfatizaron la importancia de la organización de las lecciones, la reflexión y la retroalimentación en la facilitación de sus habilidades de comprensión. En general, los participantes mostraron actitudes positivas hacia la instrucción estratégica, reportando sentirse cómodos, comprometidos y motivados. Esta investigación subraya la efectividad de integrar estrategias de lectura inferencial en entornos de aprendizaje en línea, ofreciendo información valiosa sobre las percepciones de los estudiantes y el impacto de la instrucción estratégica en el mejoramiento de la comprensión lectora.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
comprehension. E?itim ve bilim. https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2020.8782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8782
Burns, A. (2009). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A guide for Practitioners. https://n9.cl/ou9m1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863466
Chamot, A., & Robbins, J. (2005). The CALLA model: Strategies for ELL student success. Second Language Learning Consultants. https://n9.cl/jjl8x
Cheng, L., Wu, Y., & Liu, X. (2015). Chinese university students’ perceptions of assessment tasks and classroom assessment environment. Language Testing in Asia, 5(13). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-015-0020-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-015-0020-6
Dorman, J. P., & Knightley, W. M. (2006). Development and validation of an instrument to assess secondary school students’ perceptions of assessment tasks. Educational studies, 32(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690500415951 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690500415951
Elleman, A. M. (2017). Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers: A Metaanalytic Review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 761-781. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000180
Fälth, L., & Nord, A. (2018). Reading strategies in high school: High school students’ experiences of an inclusive education approach. International Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 29-37. https://n9.cl/hyoit
Fu, Y. (2012). A study on Strategies-Based reading instruction at College level. Studies in Literature and Language, 4(3), 50-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2–3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gómez, Á., Devís, A., & López, V. S. (2013). Corrección de errores en comprensión lectora en inglés: una instrucción teóricamente fundamentada basada en estrategias macroestructurales. Tejuelo, 16(16), 88-107. https://n9.cl/35qmq
Hara, A. & Tappe, H. (2016). Inference generation and text comprehension in bilingual children: A case study’, Literator, 37(2), a1287. https://n9.cl/9kwigh DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/lit.v37i2.1287
Lee, H. C. (2013). Thinking Matters: Inferencing in ESL reading lessons. TESOL Journal, 4(4), 717-742. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.75 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.75
Lopera, S. (2012). Effects of strategy instruction in an EFL reading comprehension course: A case study. Profile Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 14(1), 79-89. https://n9.cl/2gl2g
Mwita, M.K. (2022). Factors to consider when using qualitative interviews in data collection. Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Journal (SHE Journal), 3(3), 313 – 323. https://n9.cl/ocsp1s
Nuttall, C. (2005). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Oxford. Macmillan Education.
Pacheco, N. (2019). How Effective is the Metacognitive Strategy of Thinking Aloud in Enhancing Reading Comprehension for Students with Special Learning Needs Working in a 10th Grade English Language Class. https://n9.cl/meu0t3
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2013). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. https://n9.cl/nghte DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Pan, S., & Sana, F. (2021). Pretesting versus posttesting: Comparing the pedagogical benefits of errorful generation and retrieval practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(2), 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000345
Taft, S., Kesten, K., & El-Banna, M. (2019). One size does not fit all: Toward an evidence-based framework for determining online course enrollment sizes in higher education. Online Learning, 23(3), 188-233. DOI:10.24059/olj.v23i3.1534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i3.1534
William and Mary School of Education. (2002). Inferential Reading Comprehension Packet. https://n9.cl/qsh2nc
Younus, M., & Khan, I. (2017). The effects of strategy-based reading instruction on reading comprehension and reading strategy use. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 5(2), 106-120. DOI:10.20547/jess0521705202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20547/jess0521705202