Abc of the doctoral thesis with a proactive competence approach DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v7i2.6
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aimed to examine what is happening today in university research and its connection with the processes of qualification through the preparation of doctoral thesis work as a new form of social research didactic that invites their differentiation. Faced with this perspective, the general objective focused on examining theoretical-practical budgets for the development of proactive competences in the institutional procedures of tutorials of doctoral students of the fourth level of formal studies. The validation criteria are closely related to the research processes of academic degree according to the regulations of each university. The methodology tested in the topic was of an exploratory type, making it broad and unfinished, because it aimed to give a general view of a certain reality with respect to research in the university (tutor-tutored). In this purpose, the qualitative method is required and ordinarily the method of the logic of structures (university) and its actors (academic organization, teachers, students) for the interpretation of reality. As a result, it was necessary to implement a suitable dynamic in the establishment of expedited local development processes under the strictest standards generally accepted by the university community, basically in the region with a secondary projection towards Latin America and the Caribbean. The main conclusion is empowering in the socialization of a scale for the viability of an investigation in university grounds.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Ander-Egg, E. (2011). Aprender a investigar. Córdoba: Brujas. American Psichological Association (2010). Manual de Publicaciones de la American Psichological Association. [Traducción al español de Publication Manual of the American Psycholgical Association] (3ra ed.). México: El Manual Moderno.
Arias, F. (2012). El proyecto de investigación. 6ta. ed. Venezuela: Epísteme. Balcázar, P., González, N., Gurrola, G. y Moysén, A. (2013). Investigación cualitativa. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Centty, D. (2010). Manual metodológico para el investigador cien-tífico. Perú: Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa.
Constitución de la República del Ecuador (2008). Registro Oficial 449 del 20 de octubre de 2018.
Constitución de la República del Ecuador (2017). Epítome de Metodología de Investigación, Científica Contemporánea. Serie: Vol. 3. Ecuador: Autor. Crespo, L., Hernández R. y Infante, M. (2019). Prácticas asistidas enfocadas en la formación de estudiantes: experiencias UNIANDES, Ecuador. Revista científica Espacios, Vol. 40, (8), p. 8.
Crespo, L. (2016). Epítome de Metodología de Investigación Cien-tífica Contemporánea. Serie: Vol. 2. Ecuador: Autor.
Constitución de la República del Ecuador (2017). Epítome de Metodología de Investigación, Científica Contemporánea. Serie: Vol. 3. Ecuador: Autor. Dei, D. (2008). La Tesis. Cómo orientarse en su elaboración. 3ra. ed. España: Prometeo Libros.
Domingues, J. (2018). Pastillas gerenciales. Perú: Universidad Católica, Los Ángeles de Chimbote. Eco, U. (2003). Cómo se hace una tesis. España: Gedisa.
Espejo R. y Sarmiento, R. (2017). Orientaciones para el diseño y rediseño de programas de formación con enfoque de competencias en la Universidad de Chile. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
Hernández; R., Fernández, C. y Baptista, L. (2014). Cómo se originan las investigaciones cuantitativas, cualitativas y mixtas. 6ta. ed. México: Mc Graw-Hill.
Koepsell, D., Ruíz, M. (2015). Ética de la Investigación. Integridad científica. México: elhuerto.
Ley Orgánica Reformatoria a la Educación Superior (2018).
Registro Oficial Suplemento N° 297 del 02 de julo de 2018.
Maya, N. y Rivero, S. (2010). Conocer el cerebro para la excelencia en la educación. España: Innobasque. Ríos, R. (2017). Metodología para la investigación y redacción. España: Universidad de Málaga. Servicios Académicos Inter-continentales S.L.
Sampieri, R. (2016). Metodología de la Investigación. México: Mc Graw-Hill, 2016.
Sánchez, R. (2014). Una didáctica nueva de la investigación en ciencias sociales y humanas. México: UNAM. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.9786070258336e.2014
Schettini, P. y Cortazzo, I. (2015). Análisis de datos cualitativos en la investigación social: procedimientos y herramientas para la interpretación de la información cualitativa. Argentina: Universidad de la Planta. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35537/10915/49017
Sirignano, F., Gómez, J. y Meneses, E. (Eds.). (2018). Investigación y prácticas universitarias. España: Universidad de Alicante, 2018.
Tamayo, M. (2003). El proceso de la investigación científica. 4ta. ed. México: Limusa.
UNESCO (2015). Informe sobre la Ciencia. Recuperado de: https://tinyurl.com/y9h3ojel [Acceso: 15 de septiembre de 2018]