Online and Face-to-Face English Language Learning: Perspective of Undergraduate Students in English Language Teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v18i1.647
Main Article Content
Abstract
Educational settings are transforming with technological advances and recent global circumstances, driven by the implementation of virtual and in-person teaching modalities for learning English as a foreign language. This research analyzed students' perceptions in the Pedagogy of National and Foreign Languages ??program regarding their language learning in both virtual and in-person modalities. It was based on the pragmatic paradigm, comparative historical method, mixed approach, sequential exploratory design, multiple integration, and cross-sectional design. The study population comprised 56 students in the Pedagogy of National and Foreign Languages ??program at the Peninsula State University of Santa Elena, Playas Campus. Structured surveys and semi-structured interviews were combined. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. The results revealed a strong preference for the in-person learning modality, highlighted by its ability to foster direct interaction and the use of English language skills. In contrast, the virtual modality is valued for its flexibility, access to digital resources, and support for independent learning. However, students noted significant limitations, such as limited direct interaction with peers and technical issues related to connectivity and devices. This study underscores the importance of implementing pedagogical strategies that leverage the advantages of both modalities and overcome their limitations.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Ander-Egg, E. (1995). Técnicas de Investigación Social. Lumen.
Basantes, A. E. A., Escobar, M. M. G., Cárdenas, M. M. Y., & Barragán, Murillo. R. de los Á. (2021). The impact of virtuality on English language learning in higher education O impacto da virtualidade na aprendizagem da língua inglesa no ensino superior. Polo Del Conocimiento, 6 (5), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v6i5.2630
Canese, de E. M. I., Estigarribia, V. R., Ibarra, G., & Valenzuela, R. (2020). Aplicabilidad del Diseño Exploratorio Secuencial para la medición de habilidades cognitivas: una experiencia en la Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Paraguay. ARANDU-UTIC – Revista Científica Internacional, 7(2), 63–76. https://n9.cl/2vfid
Collier, D. (1993). Método Comparativo. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 21–46. https://n9.cl/5w8xa
D’olivares, D. N., & Casteblanco, C. C. L. (2015). Un acercamiento a los enfoques de investigación y tradiciones investigativas en educación. RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad, 3(1–2), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.22209/rhs.v3n1.2a04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22209/rhs.v3n1.2a04
Gutierrez, G. R., Salazar Zavaleta, J. R., Rivera Pezo, E. H., Flores Piñas, H., & Chiri Saravia, P. C. (2022). Estrategias de aprendizaje virtual y aprendizaje del idioma inglés en estudiantes. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 6(6), 2715–2725. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v6i6.3723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v6i6.3723
Hadi, M., Martel, C., Huayta, F., Rojas, R., & Arias, J. (2023). Metodología de la investigación: Guía para el proyecto de tesis. In Metodología de la investigación: Guía para el proyecto de tesis. Instituto Universitario de Innovación Ciencia y Tecnología Inudi Perú. https://doi.org/10.35622/inudi.b.073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35622/inudi.b.073
Mejía, R. J. (2022). Los paradigmas en la investigación científica. Revista Ciencia Agraria, 1(3), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.35622/j.rca.2022.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35622/j.rca.2022.03.001
Morena, I., Rosas, M. O., & Saraceni, A. C. (2022). Enseñanza y Aprendizaje Virtual de Inglés en la Universidad: Percepciones del Estudiantado hacia una Modalidad Post Pandemia. RihumSo Revista de Investigación Del Departamento de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, 22, 159–182. https://doi.org/10.54789/rihumso.22.11.22.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54789/rihumso.22.11.22.9
Mucha-Hospinal, L. F., Chamorro, M. R., Oseda, L. M. E., & Alania-Contreras, R. D. (2021). Evaluación de procedimientos que se toman para la población y muestra en trabajos de investigación. Desafios, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.37711/desafios.2021.12.1.253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37711/desafios.2021.12.1.253
Peña, S. J. B., & Orgaz-Agüera, F. (2022). Modalidad Virtual y Presencial en la Universidad. Estudio de Caso Comparativo en la República Dominicana. Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.51896/atlante/esso6975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51896/atlante/ESSO6975
Rodríguez, M., & Mendivelso, F. (2018). Diseño de investigación de Corte Transversal. Revista Médica Sanitas, 21(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.26852/01234250.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26852/01234250.20
Soto, C. L. N. (2019). Virtualidad y presencialidad en el aprendizaje del inglés como lengua extranjera. Universidad de La Salle. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación. Licenciatura en Español y Lenguas Extranjeras. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14625/1060
Spencer, D., & Temple, T. (2021). Examining students’ online course perceptions and comparing student performance outcomes in online and face-to-face classrooms. Online Learning Journal, 25(2), 233–261. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i2.2227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i2.2227
Sucari, W., Hancco, S., Sosa-Gutierrez, F., Duran-Chambilla, S., & Paredes-Aliaga, J. (2024). ¿Se aprende mejor en la modalidad virtual o en la modalidad presencial? Percepciones de estudiantes de una universidad pública peruana. Revista de La Sociedad Científica Del Paraguay, 29(1), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.32480/rscp.2024.29.1.43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32480/rscp.2024.29.1.43
Wright, B. M. (2017). Blended learnings student perception of face-to-face and online EFL lessons. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6859