The Impact of Simulators on the Learning of Digital Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v16i1.350
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The return to the new normality brought with it a series of changes in the ways of transmitting knowledge, the lack of access to laboratories to carry out practices was one of the main problems of classes in the hybrid modality; therefore, this objective of the research was to implement the use of computer simulators which can remedy the need for quality laboratory practices to achieve significant learning. The research was based on the inductive method, a positivist paradigm with a quantitative approach of experimental design of correlational type and with a cross-section. The selected sample consisted of 17 students with an engineering career in computer and communication technologies of the Autonomous University of Carmen's information sciences faculty. The methodology used was the application of an instrument in which students' relationship with technological tools facilitates their learning. The results demonstrated a close relationship with simulators, and their implementation generated better results, decreasing course failure; it was required to continue generating this type of course design, including real-time access technologies to build their knowledge; the research demonstrated the use of simulators has an impact on learning.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Argibay, J. (2009). Muestra de la investigacion cuantitativa. Subjetividad y Procesos Cognitivos, 13(1), 13–29. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=30811997003
Arrieta-Illarramendi, M. (1998). Medios materiales en la enseñanza de la matemática. Revista de psicodidáctica, 5, 107–114. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/175/17517803011.pdf
Barradas-Arenas, U. D. (2021). Recursos digitales como apoyo en la enseñanza del cálculo. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 12(23). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v12i23.1040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v12i23.1040
Barrios-Córdova, A., Vaquera-Huerta, H., Romero-Padilla, J. M., Crossa, J., & Burguete-Hernández, E. (2020). Estudio comparativo de técnicas de optimización multirespuesta en diseños experimentales. Ingeniería Investigación y Tecnología, 21(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22201/fi.25940732e.2020.21n2.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fi.25940732e.2020.21n2.016
Campo, A., & Oviedo, H. (2005). Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, XXXIV (1), 571–580. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/806/80634409.pdf%0Ahttp://www.redalyc.org/pdf/806/80650839004.pdf
Cano, E. (2015). Superior: ¿Uso O Abuso? Profesorado, 19(2), 265–280. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/567/56741181017.pdf
Cazares, S. I. (2014). Razonamiento Estadístico de Estudiantes Universitarios sobre el Análisis de Datos en un Ambiente Computacional TT - Statistical Reasoning of University Students on Data Analysis in Computational Environment. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 28(50), 1262–1286. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-636X2014000301262&lang=pt%0Ahttp://www.scielo.br/pdf/bolema/v28n50/1980-4415-bolema-28-50-1262.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v28n50a13
Cuchca, E. M. (2021). Enfoque cualitativo y cuantitativo de la evaluación formativa Qualitative and quantitative approach to formative evaluation. 6, 0–11. https://revistas.utm.edu.ec/index.php/Rehuso/article/view/1684
Durán, E. B. (2008). Experiencia de Enseñanza Adaptada al Estilo de Aprendizaje de los Estudiantes en un Curso de Simulación Teaching Experience adapted to the Learning Style of the Students of a Simulation Course. 1(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062008000100004
Echeverria, J., Pacenza, M. I., & Urquijo, S. (2011). participación de estudiantes en actividades académicas. Motivación y nivel de información. PSIENCIA. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencia Psicológica, 3(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.5872/psiencia/3.2.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5872/psiencia/3.2.23
Espinoza-García, C. M., & Fernández-Batanero, J. M. (2012). An audiovisual material for the teaching of the statistics. Pixel-Bit, 40, 185–196.
Fuller, L. L., Lon L., & Hart, H. L. A. (2016). El debate Hart-Fuller. 166.
Góngora-Parra, Y., & Martínez-Leyet, O. L. (2012). Del diseño instruccional al diseño de aprendizaje con aplicación de las tecnologías. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 13(3), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.9144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.9144
González-Beltrán, V. A. (2022). Estrategia Didáctica para el Aprendizaje de la Legislación Informática con uso de la Tecnología Educativa. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 15(1), 75-79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v15i1.277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v15i1.277
Gorina, A., & Alonso, I. (2017). Perfeccionando el procesamiento de la información en investigaciones pedagógicas desde una relación metodológica cualitativa-cuantitativa. Revista Encuentros, 15(2), 189–206. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4766/476655856011.pdf
Martinez-Hernandez, A. C., & Valderrama-Juarez, L. E. (2010). Revista Electrónica Nova Scientia Motivación para Estudiar en Jóvenes de Nivel Medio Superior Motivation to Study in High School Students. Nova Scientia, 3, 164–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v3i5.205
Morán, O. D., & Monasterolo, R. R. (2009). Enseñanza-Aprendizaje en Robótica. Construcción de Simuladores como Actividades de Comprensión. Formación universitaria, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062009000400005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062009000400005
Müggenburg, M., & Pérez, I. (2007). Los maestros escriben Tipos de estudio en el enfoque de investigación cuantitativa. Revista Enfermería Universitaria ENEO-UNAM, 4(1), 35–38. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3587/358741821004.pdf
Rodríguez, P. (2010). El positivismo y el racionalismo no han muerto. Educere, 14(48), 63–71. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=35616720007
Tobergte, D. R., & Curtis, S. (2011). Los Simuladores. Su potencial para la enseñanza universitaria. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
Toselli, L. A., Guerrero, M. P., Monesterolo, V. M., & Beltrán, R. A. (2009). Aplicación del Simulador ChemCADTM en la Enseñanza en Carreras de Ingeniería. Formación universitaria, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062009000300004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062009000300004
Tur-Ferrer, G., & Urbina-Ramírez, S. (2016). Rúbrica Para La Evaluación De Portafolios Electrónicos En El Entorno De La Web Social. Píxel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educación, 48, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2016.i48.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2016.i48.06
Velandia, M. A. A., Morales, F. H. F., Duarte, J. E., & Niños, G. de D. para la E. de la C. y la T. en. (2007). Material educativo computarizado para enseñanza de la instrumentación básica en electrónica. Tecnura, 11, 114–122. http://www.redalyc.org/resumen.oa?id=257021008011%5Cnhttp://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2570/257021008011.pdf
Vélez-Amador, R. E. (2017). Modelo de producción de vídeos didácticos para la modalidad presencial de la enseñanza universitaria / Model of production of didactic videos for the Face-To-Face Modality of University Education. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, 69–97. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2017.43.69-97 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2017.43.69-97
Zuluaga-Ramírez, C. M., & Gómez-Suta, M. del P. (2018). Propuesta de escenario lúdico para facilitar el proceso de enseñanza – aprendizaje en temáticas de Simulación Discreta. Scientia Et Technica, 23(2), 187–194. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=84958001008
Únete a nuestro canal de Telegram para recibir notificaciones de nuestras publicaciones
