Learning process in children and adolescents potentialized through social networks DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v7i2.78
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research aimed to analyze the use of social networks and their negative effect on the learning process in children of the educational institutions of the Riohacha municipality. It was descriptive in nature with a non-experimental, transectional and field design; a three-aspect content instrument was used for parents and two for teachers of the institution. The sample consisted of 50 teachers and 100 parents from 10 institutions of the municipality. The results indicate that the social networks most used by children and adolescents are WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram and Snapchat, as well as the effects on learning behaviors that were evidenced: mood modification, salience, abstinence and lack of attention. It is recommended as parents to have mastery of content and forms of social networks and as an institution to establish schedules for the use of social networks and incorporate extra-academic activities to consolidate comprehensive training, with the effect of co-responsibility.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
References
Beuchot, M. (2004). Filosofía y Derechos Humanos. Editorial, Siglo Veintiuno. S.A. C.V. México.
Borjas, R. (2007). Sociedad, Cultura y Derecho, Editorial Planeta, Ecuador Consejo Pontificio. Para La Familia (2006). Términos ambiguos y discutidos sobre familia, vida y cuestiones éticas. Editorial, Ediciones Palabras S.A. Madrid, España
De Santisteban, P y Gámez, M. (2017). Estrategias de persuasión en grooming online de menores: un análisis cualitativo con agresores en prisión Psychosocial Intervention, vol. 26, núm. 3, diciembre, 2017, pp. 139-146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psi.2017.02.001
Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid Madrid, España. Escobar, V. (2003). Ética Introducción a su Problemática y su Historia. Editorial McGraw Hill, México.
Fernández, N. (2013). Trastornos de conducta y redes sociales en Internet. Salud mental, 36(6), 521-527. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-33252013000600010&lng=es&tlng=es. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17711/SM.0185-3325.2013.063
Gabaldón R. Fernando (2008) Política y Gerencia. Universidad de los Andes, Consejo de Publicaciones, Mérida, Venezuela
Gonzálvez, J. (2011). La Web 2,0 Y 3,0 en Su Relación Con El Eees. Compilación. Editorial Visión Libros, Madrid España.
Kidshealth Organization (2013). Acoso cibernético. Consulta del 18 de agosto, 2018, http://kidshealth.org/teen/en_espa-nol/seguridad/cyberbullying_esp.htmlMaritain, J. (1981). Anuario de derechos Humanos, volumen 1. Universidad Complutense, España.
Mashable. (2012). Pinterest is Now the No. 3 Social Network in the U.S. Recuperado el 21 de enero de 2018, de Mashable: http://mashable.com/2012/04/06/pinterest-number-3-social-network/
Martínez, M. (2008). Nociones Básicas Sobre Derechos Humano. Ministerio de Educación, publicación con motivo de los 60 años de la Declaración de los Derechos Humanos. Montevideo, Uruguay
Mejía-Soto, G. (2014). Sexting: una modalidad cada vez más ex-tendida de violencia sexual entre jóvenes. Perinatol Reprod Hum 2014; 28 (4): 217-221.
Piaget, J. (1991). Seis estudios de Psicología. Editorial Labor S. A. Barcelona
Proyecto_Daphne. (2013). Ciberbullying y privacidad: Guía para profesores. Consulta del 16 de junio, 2013. http://www.super-kidsonline.es/descargas/PROYECTO_DAPHNE_ES.pdf
Vygotsky, L. (1975). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Buenos Aires: Grijalbo.
Wersth, J. (1985). Vygotsky y la formación social de la mente. Editorial Paidos Iberica. ISBN:978847509487