Relational Architectures of Networked Learning: A Transcomplex Approach in Emerging Educational and Technological Contexts DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v19i1.805

Main Article Content

Dra. Vergaras, A. J.
VE
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5043-0700
MSc. González-Castro, J. L.
VE
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3807-0293
Dra. García-Mago, C.
VE
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4907-6578
Dr. Rosillón-Olivares, K. E.
VE
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0172-3828
Dra. Campos Medina, M. A.
VE
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1370-4491
Dra. Mujica-Sequera, R. M.
US
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2602-5199

Abstract

Research in the 21st century was challenged by the need to transcend reductionist paradigms that constrained the understanding of complex, dynamic, and interconnected educational realities. In response, this essay proposed a transcomplex architecture of networked learning as an integrative epistemological framework to re-signify knowledge construction in emerging educational and technological environments. The study was framed within an inductive method, under a humanistic paradigm, with a qualitative interpretative approach, descriptive-interpretative type, and a topical narrative design. Methodologically, it was grounded in a critical and interpretative documentary review of scientific literature indexed in high-impact academic databases, which was analyzed through thematic and hermeneutic techniques. The analysis addressed the transition from disciplinary fragmentation to relational rationality, reconceptualized learning as an emergent phenomenon within interconnected ecosystems, examined the reconfiguration of expert knowledge in contemporary professional dynamics, and explored the constitutive role of technological mediations in hybrid learning environments. These dimensions were articulated into a transcomplex analytical framework that integrated epistemological, pedagogical, and technological perspectives. The study contributed a transcomplex conceptual model, hereafter referred to as the transcomplex architecture of networked learning, which redefined knowledge construction as a relational, distributed, and technologically mediated process. The findings positioned transcomplexity as a robust epistemological foundation for understanding and transforming educational realities, emphasizing dialogicity, interdisciplinarity, and the co-construction of knowledge in contexts shaped by uncertainty, interconnectivity, and digital mediation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Vergaras, A. J., González-Castro, J. L., García-Mago, C., Rosillón-Olivares, K. E., Campos Medina, M. A., & Mujica-Sequera, R. M. (2026). Relational Architectures of Networked Learning: A Transcomplex Approach in Emerging Educational and Technological Contexts. Docentes 2.0 Journal, 19(1), 444–456. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v19i1.805
Section
Essays

Citaciones del Artículo

CITATIONS
15
VIEWS
ALTMETRIC
DIMENSIONS

References

Acosta Santillán, J. K., Hoyos Morán, D. I., Carabajo García, E. A., & Romero Morales, M. F. (2025). Perspectivas epistemológicas sobre la interdisciplinariedad en la educación básica superior: Retos, oportunidades e implicaciones para el aprendizaje significativo. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 9(1), 11709–11725. https://go.docentes20.com/r98y

Anijovich, R., & Cappelletti, G. (2025). Tensiones y horizontes educativos en tiempos de cambio: y si la secundaria fuera distinta? Documento básico. Santillana.

Bajestani, M. S., Mun, D., & Kim, D. B. (2026). Human-in-the-loop and large language models in smart manufacturing: Current applications, challenges, and perspectives. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 86, 913–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2026.04.027

Balza, A. (2012). Pensar la investigación postdoctoral desde una perspectiva transcompleja. Investigación y Postgrado, 24(3), pp. 45-66. Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/658/65818200003.pdf

Castells, M. (2010). La era de la información: economía, sociedad y cultura. Volumen I: la sociedad red. Alianza editorial. España.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. National Research Council Canada. https://go.docentes20.com/rb8pv

Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5–6), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816

Giddens, A. (1995). Modernidad e identidad del yo: el yo y la sociedad en la época contemporánea. Editorial Península.

Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza Torres, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Education.

Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781

Morin, E. (2008). On complexity. Hampton Press.

Morin, E. (2010). La cabeza bien puesta. Editorial Seix Barral. Biblioteca Edgar Morin. España.

Mujica-Sequera, R. M. (2024). Clasificación de las Herramientas de la Inteligencia Artificial en la Educación. Revista Docentes 2.0, 17(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v17i1.513´

Mujica-Sequera, R. M. (2025). Los Prompts de IA: Herramientas para la Optimización de la Investigación Científica. Revista Docentes 2.0, 18(1), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v18i1.616

Nicolescu, B. (2002). La transdisciplinariedad: Manifiesto. Editorial 7 saberes. UNESCO.

Parrales, J. R. A. (2025). Interdisciplinariedad y su impacto en el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico en estudiantes de educación superior. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 9(3), 1120–1142. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i2.17541

Salamanca-Aroca, C., & Sepúlveda-Bernales, V. (2024). Hacia una ecología de saberes para la formación docente interdisciplinar; algunas orientaciones prácticas. Educación y Ciudad, 46, e3010. https://doi.org/10.36737/01230425.n46.2024.3010

Santos, B.D.S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634876

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2003). Transdisciplinarity: Stimulating synergies, integrating knowledge. UNESCO Publishing.

Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury.

Senge, P. (1992). La quinta disciplina: El arte y la práctica de la organización abierta a aprendizaje. Editorial Granica.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Villegas, C. (2012). La transcomplejidad: Una nueva forma de pensar. Editorial Académica Española.

Wenger, E. (2001). Comunidades de práctica: aprendizaje, significado e identidad. Editorial Paidós.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Join our community

Receive notifications about new calls for papers, publications and academic events.