Coping Schemas and Their Impact on Burnout
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v19i1.763
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Currently, we live in an environment characterized by multiple demands in the social, family, and work spheres. The work environment, in particular, has attracted increasing attention, given the recognized impact of psychological well-being on employee performance. This research aimed to analyze the relationship between coping strategies and the manifestation of burnout syndrome in organizational contexts. To this end, a qualitative approach was employed, framed within the interpretive paradigm, using the hermeneutic method, a narrative-thematic design, and a documentary-analytical, cross-sectional approach. The population consisted of scientific studies published between 2017 and 2024, obtained from the following databases: Google Scholar, SciELO, Dialnet, and Redalyc. The bibliographic review technique and a document analysis matrix were used to organize and systematize the information into thematic categories. The analysis was critical, qualitative, and systematic. The results revealed that avoidant coping is associated with higher levels of burnout, while adaptive strategies, such as problem-solving and social support, act as protective factors. The discussion highlighted the influence of gender, resilience, and the methodological quality of the studies on the findings. In conclusion, the importance of strengthening adaptive coping strategies to mitigate burnout in the workplace is emphasized. Ethical principles and academic integrity were respected throughout the research process.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
Citaciones del Artículo
References
Burgos Cárdenas, A. P., & Orozco Fernández, I. (2020). Síndrome de burnout y su incidencia en el ámbito laboral. Revista de Investigación Formativa: Innovación y Aplicaciones Técnico-Tecnológicas, 2(1), 9. https://ojs.formacion.edu.ec/index.php/rei/article/view/v2.n1.a9
Cháidez Nevárez, J., & Barraza Macías, A. (2018). Afrontamiento al estrés y su relación con el tipo de jornada laboral en docentes de educación primaria. Informes Psicológicos, 18(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.18566/infpsic.v18n2a04
Cruz, D. M., & Puentes, A. (2017). Relación entre las diferentes dimensiones del síndrome de burnout y las estrategias de afrontamiento empleadas por los guardas de seguridad de una empresa privada de la ciudad de Tunja. Psicogente, 20(38). https://doi.org/10.17081/psico.20.38.2548
Gadamer, H. G. (1977). Verdad y método. Sígueme.
Gorozabel Vetrov, A. T., & García Cedeño, M. L. (2020). Resiliencia y estrategias de afrontamiento en estudiantes egresados de Psicología Clínica. Revista Sinapsis, 3(18).
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage Publications.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Education.
Jorquera Gutiérrez, R., & González Rodríguez, S. (2021). Bienestar psicológico y sentimiento de individuación laboral en trabajadores chilenos. Investigación Psicológica, 23–33.
Leyva Haza, J., & Guerra Véliz, Y. (2020). Objeto de investigación y campo de acción: Componentes del diseño de una investigación científica. EDUMECENTRO, 12(3), 241–260.
Lovo, J. (2020). Síndrome de burnout: Un problema moderno. Entorno, (70), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.5377/entorno.v0i70.10371
Magaña, M., Bermejo Higuera, J. C., Villacieros, M., & Prieto, R. (2019). Estilos de afrontamiento y diferencias de género ante la muerte. Revista de Psicoterapia, 30(112), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v30i112.269
Malagón-Rojas, J. N., Torres, L. E. R., Puentes, A. P., & Téllez-Ávila, E. M. (2021). La “moda del burnout” en el sector salud: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Psicología desde el Caribe, 38(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.14482/psdc.38.1.158.723
Morán Astorga, M. C., Finez-Silva, M. J., Menezes dos Anjos, E., Pérez-Lancho, M. C., Urchaga-Litago, J. D., & Vallejo-Pérez, G. (2019). Estrategias de afrontamiento que predicen mayor resiliencia. Revista INFAD de Psicología. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 4(1), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2019.n1.v4.1542
Noguera Mena, H. (2021). Fortalecimiento de las estrategias de afrontamiento en relación al estrés laboral: Una experiencia de sistematización. Enfermería Actual de Costa Rica, (40), e43713. https://doi.org/10.15517/revenf.v0i40.43713
Orozco, C. S., Vargas, J. D. P., Carvajal, O. I. G., & Torres, B. E. M. (2020). Bienestar psicológico, estrés y factores psicosociales en trabajadores de instituciones gubernamentales de Jalisco-México. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 26(1), 25–30.
Sanches, M., & Murillo, F. J. (2021). Investigación exploratoria: fundamentos y aplicación. En D. Vizcaíno et al. (Eds.), Fundamentos de investigación educativa. Editorial Académica Española.
Schenkel, E. N., & Pérez, M. I. (2018). Un abordaje teórico de la investigación cualitativa como enfoque metodológico. CLACSO.
Valadez Jiménez, A., Uribe Alvarado, J. I., Vacío Muro, M. D. L. Á., & Torres-López, T. M. (2019). Relación entre situaciones generadoras de estrés, burnout y afrontamiento en entrenadores deportivos. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 28(2), 161–168.
Valdivieso-León, L., Lucas Mangas, S., Tous-Pallarés, J., & Espinoza-Díaz, I. M. (2020). Estrategias de afrontamiento del estrés académico universitario: Educación infantil-primaria. Educación XX1, 23(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.25651
Vargas-Cruz, L. D., Niño-Cardozo, C. L., & Acosta-Maldonado, Y. Y. (2017). Estrategias que modulan el síndrome de burnout en enfermeros(as): Una revisión bibliográfica. Revista Ciencia y Cuidado, 14(1), 111–131.
Vasilachis, I. (1992). Estrategias de investigación cualitativa. Gedisa.
Vizcaíno Zúñiga, P. I., Cedeño Cedeño, R. J., & Maldonado Palacios, I. A. (2023). Metodología de la investigación científica: Guía práctica. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(4), 9723–9762. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i4.7658