Webinars as a Strategy for Continuing Education for Teachers at a Public University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v19i1.744
Main Article Content
Abstract
Continuing professional development for higher education faculty is a key element in ensuring educational quality and strengthening the pedagogical and digital skills required to meet the demands of teaching. The objective was to assess the satisfaction of university faculty with a continuing professional development activity, specifically a webinar on H5P-type activities for designing virtual learning environments. The research was framed within the positivist paradigm, using a deductive method, with a quantitative approach, a non-experimental, descriptive, and cross-sectional design. A non-probability convenience sample of 286 participants was used. The UNIA Webinar Satisfaction Survey (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.789) was administered, comprising four sections: program organization and coordination; instructor performance; technical aspects and experience in the webinar; and general assessments. Results showed that 98.8% of participants considered the activity to have met their expectations, 99.0% identified it as a useful learning tool, and 93.0% highlighted the facilitator's mastery of the subject matter. However, low active participation was observed during the live session (75.9% did not participate). It is concluded that the webinar was positively valued as a continuing education strategy, reaffirming its relevance for strengthening teaching skills, although the need to promote greater interaction in live sessions is identified.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications in our journal accept the following terms:
- When a work is accepted for publication, the author retains rights of reproduction, distribution of his/her article for exploitation in all countries of the world in the format provided by our magazine and any other magnetic medium, optical, and digital.
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right first to publish their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Acknowledgment License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)). That allows third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, under the following conditions: Acknowledgment - You must properly acknowledge authorship, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests you have the licensor's endorsement or receive it for your use. NonCommercial - You may not use the material for a commercial purpose. NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build from the material, you cannot broadcast the modified material. There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict you from doing what the license allows.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives, repositories, libraries, or their website), producing exciting exchanges and increasing the published work's citations.
- Request of withdrawal an article has to be done in writing by the author to the Editor, becoming effective after a written response from the Editor. For this purpose, the author or authors will send correspondence via e-mail: [email protected].
- The author will not receive financial compensation for the publication of his work.
- All Docentes 2.0 Journal publications are under the Open Journal System (OJS) platform at: https://ojs.docentes20.com/.
Citaciones del Artículo
References
Alviar Luján, R., Welson Valencia Vda. De Calderón, M. & Castañeda-Castañeda, I. (2025). Competencia Digital Docente a través de la Integración de las TIC en una pública de Ica. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 18(1), 351-365. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v18i1.639
Amador, J. G., González, V., Estrada, J., Islas, M. V., Ramírez, S., & Rojas, J. (2020). Evaluación del impacto del seminario análisis conductual aplicado usando el modelo Kirkpatrick. Revista Digital Internacional de Psicología y Ciencia Social, 6(1), 208-226. https://doi.org/10.22402/j.rdipycs.unam.6.1.2020.210.208-226
Bernal, C. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. Pearson.
Compen, B., De Witte, K. & Schelfhout, W. (2021). The impact of teacher engagement in an interactive webinar series on the effectiveness of financial literacy education. Br. J. Educ. Technol, 52, 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13013
Cruz, M. (2020). Formación continua del docente como factor de la calidad educativa universitaria. Revista Científica Internacional, 3(1), 73-79. https://doi.org/10.46734/revcientifica.v3i1.21
Fernández, I., Bethencourt, A., Martín, S., Becerra-Brito, C., & Area, M. (2021). Perceptions on the educational impact of COVID-19: Analysis of a TECNOEDU Webinar. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, (15), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.5732
González, M. O. (2021). La capacitación docente para una educación remota de emergencia por la pandemia de la COVID-19. Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación, 19, 81-102. https://doi.org/10.51302/tce. 2021.614
Guevara, G. P., Verdesoto, A. E., & Castro, N. E. (2020). Metodologías de investigación educativa (descriptivas, experimentales, participativas, y de investigación-acción). RECIMUNDO, 4(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.26820/recimundo/4.(3).julio.2020.163-173
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, M. P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. McGrawHill.
Hernández, S., & Duana., D. (2020). Técnicas e instrumentos de recolección de datos. Boletín Científico de las Ciencias Económico Administrativas del ICEA, 9(17), 51-53. https://doi.org/10.29057/icea.v9i17.6019
Medina, M. A., Rojas, C. R., Bustamante, C., Loaiza, R. M., Martes, C. P., & Castillo, R. (2023). Metodología de la investigación: Técnicas e instrumentos de investigación. Instituto Universitario de Innovación Ciencia y Tecnología Inudi Perú S.A.C. https://doi.org/10.35622/inudi.b.80
Merino-Nambo, I. L. (2014). Blog y Webinar como una alternativa de Formación Docente a Distancia. Una experiencia de Aprendizaje Significativo con TIC. 2do. Congreso Internacional de Innovación Educativa. https://n9.cl/iyglv0
Münich, L., & Ángeles, E. (2012). Métodos y Técnicas de Investigación. Editorial Trillas.
Obregón, L. R. (2024). Capacitación y desempeño de los docentes en una universidad privada de Lima. Horizontes. Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, 8(33), 859-871. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistahorizontes.v8i33.768
Rivera, K. P., Cordero, G., & Reyes-Angona, S. (2021). Formación continua de docentes durante la contingencia sanitaria desde la perspectiva de directivos escolares. IE Revista de Investigación Educativa de la REDIECH, 12(e1188), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.33010/ie_rie_rediech.v12i0.1188
Sánchez Trujillo, M. de los Ángeles, Bernabé-Sánchez, E., Sáenz-Egúsquiza, F. D., & Rodríguez Flores, E. A. (2023). Estrategia metodológica para la mejora de la producción oral en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Conrado, 19(95), 7–19. https://go.docentes20.com/rmep
Sánchez, M., Miró, M. L., Ruiz, F. J., & Cebrián, M. (2022). Evaluación de programas online de capacitación docente sobre innovación y competencias digitales durante la Covid-19: #webinarsUNIA. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 25(1), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.1.30763
Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa (UAS). (2024). Modelo Educativo UAS 2022. https://go.docentes20.com/r24q6